Service Law – Appointment – Search-cum- Selection Committee, after scrutinizing qualification and experience of short- Listed candidates, unanimously placed Respondent first in merit list – Acceptance of lesser salary cannot ipso facto conclude that acceptance of position was to abuse authority
(2013) 12 AD 157 : (2014) 1 CompLJ 39 : (2013) 14 JT 563 : (2013) 13 SCALE 442 : (2014) 2 SCC 609 : (2014) 1 SCC(L&S) 433…
High Court was to remit the matter to the Government for Constitution of the DPC to consider his fitment for promotion in later period, in that event, the DPC would go into the merits afresh and find out whether the respondent would be fit for promotion. If he would be found fit and recommendation is made in that behalf, the Government would appoint him on regular basis and he would get seniority only from the date of his promotion
(1997) 10 JT 628 : (1997) 3 SCALE 337 : (1997) 4 SCC 424 : (1997) SCC(L&S) 975 : (1997) 2 SCR 1133 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Section – 482 – Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section – 420, 468, 471 – Application for modification of the order
(2005) 9 SCC 161 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SURENDRA KUMAR — Respondent ( Before : B. P. Singh, J; Arun…
The Respondent would not have any right to get any further advantage in the nature of higher salary or a higher pay scale, especially when nothing from his salary was being deducted on account of his getting pension or perquisites from the earlier employer – The Tribunal was absolutely right in coming to the conclusion that the pay fixation under the order was correct because a mistake was committed in the earlier pay fixation – Appeal stands disposed of.
(2013) 11 AD 499 : (2014) 140 FLR 7 : (2013) 14 JT 203 : (2014) LabIC 1564 : (2014) 1 LLN 17 : (2013) 13 SCALE 393 :…
If any such action is taken, vis-a-vis those who are residing outside the campus by taking advantage of the order passed by the High Court, it would be open to them to go to the High Court and place the necessary material before the High Court for consideration. The High Court would look into the individual cases and pass appropriate orders according to law – Appeals disposed of.
(1997) 3 JT 725 : (1997) 3 SCALE 175 : (1997) 4 SCC 444 : (1997) 2 SCR 623 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JAI MANGLA HARIJAN KALYAN SAMITI —…
Once the land was allotted to the appellant and had become his property it loses the character of being ‘evacuee property’ thereafter; the Collector has, therefore, rightly taken note of the subsequent acquisition of land by the appellant under Section 14-B and recomputed the excess land – Appeal dismissed.
(2001) 4 JT 419 : (2001) 9 SCC 734 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before…
Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 9 – Accused persons known to witnesses – When the persons are known, identification is possible from the manner of speech, manner of walking and gesticulating and special features of a person like the physical attributes.
AIR 2003 SC 3408 : (2003) CriLJ 4982 : (2003) 8 SCALE 48 : (2003) 11 SCC 280 : (2003) 3 SCR 1079 Supp : (2003) AIRSCW 4841 :…
The language of the advertisement is clear and explicit and does not admit any ambiguity and it has to be given effect to – The Appellant Ganpat did not have a Masters’ degree in Computer Application, he was not entitled to be considered for appointment as Lecturer in MCA – Appeal stands dismissed.
(2013) 11 AD 479 : AIR 2014 SC 77 : (2014) 140 FLR 69 : (2013) 14 JT 612 : (2014) LabIC 1558 : (2014) 1 LLN 1 :…
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 13B – Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 136, 142 – Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 498A -Decree of divorce – The parties have prayed for decree of divorce by mutual consent in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 read with Article 142 of the Constitution of India – The parties have settled their disputes amicably and of their free will, Court satisfied that Memorandum of Settlement dated 17.07.2013 may be accepted by the Court
(2014) 3 RCR(Civil) 959 : (2013) 13 SCALE 142 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA VIMI VINOD CHOPRA — Appellant Vs. VINOD GULSHAN CHOPRA — Respondent ( Before : R.M. Lodha, J;…
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article – 309 – Indian Railway Establishment Code – Rule 1-A – Validity of the memorandum – The Ernakulam Bench, which held the memorandum in valid, did so for the reason that the Railway Board, which had issued the memorandum, could not have changed the provisions finding place in the Establishment Manual
(1996) 73 FLR 1676 : (1996) 5 JT 500 : (1996) 4 SCALE 670 : (1996) 4 SCC 416 : (1996) 2 SCR 358 Supp : (1996) 2 SLJ…