C P C Archives - Supreme Court of India Judgements

June 20, 2025 4:48 am

Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 805 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S KAMAKHYA TRANSPORT PVT. LTD. ETC.ETC. ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. )…

C P C

A plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC where triable issues of title and validity of sale deeds based on revoked authority and unregistered documents exist, or where multiple causes of action allow for survival of other reliefs.

Jun 1, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 772 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH VINOD INFRA DEVELOPERS LTD. Vs. MAHAVEER LUNIA AND OTHERS ( Before : J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…

C P C

Appellate court should decide on merits based on document interpretation when possible, rather than unnecessarily remanding, particularly when area and boundaries are consistent.

May 30, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 771 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PETER AUGUSTINE Vs. K.V. XAVIER AND OTHERS ( Before : B.R. Gavai, CJI. and Augustine George Masih, J. ) Civil Appeal…

C P C Limitation

A recorded satisfaction in an earlier execution petition of a prohibitory injunction decree does not preclude a subsequent petition based on fresh obstruction, and a permanent injunction lacks limitation period for execution.

May 18, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 715 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SARASWATI DEVI AND OTHERS Vs. SANTOSH SINGH AND OTHERS ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. ) Civil…

C P C

Courts exercising power to appoint Receivers under Order 40 Rule 1 CPC must exercise discretion cautiously, considering temple’s sacred nature, preferring persons with religious affinity and managing pending litigation expeditiously the temple administration

May 17, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 700 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ISHWAR CHANDA SHARMA Vs. DEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS ( Before : Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. )…

C P C Registration Act

An unregistered agreement of sale is admissible as evidence of the contract in a specific performance suit, under the proviso to Section 49, Registration Act.

May 14, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 652 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MURUGANANDAM Vs. MUNIYANDI (DIED) THROUGH LRS. ( Before : Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Joymalya Bagchi, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 6543…

C P C SEBI

Res Judicata / Constructive Res Judicata — Applicability to SEBI Proceedings — The principles of res judicata and constructive res judicata, based on public policy ensuring finality, apply to proceedings before the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and its Whole-Time Members (WTMs)

Apr 12, 2025 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. RAM KISHORI GUPTA AND ANOTHER ( Before : Sanjay Kumar and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…

C P C

An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a private employment contract, designating a competent court, is valid and enforceable, ousting jurisdiction of other courts, despite potential unequal bargaining power.

Apr 12, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 473 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAKESH KUMAR VERMA Vs. HDFC BANK LTD. ( Before : Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 2282 of…

C P C

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Section 100 & Order 41, Rules 23, 23A and 25 — Remand by High Court in Second Appeal — Justification — Remand in second appeal should only be ordered when specific conditions under Order 41 are met or when absolutely necessary

Apr 12, 2025 sclaw

2025 INSC 478 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH R. NAGARAJ (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANOTHER Vs. RAJMANI AND OTHERS ( Before : J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.…

C P C

An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a private employment contract, designating a competent court, is valid and enforceable, ousting jurisdiction of other courts, despite potential unequal bargaining power.

Apr 10, 2025 sclaw

025 INSC 473 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAKESH KUMAR VERMA Vs. HDFC BANK LTD. ( Before : Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 2282 of…

You missed

Consumer

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation

Jun 12, 2025 sclaw

Constitution

Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.

Jun 11, 2025 sclaw

C P C Railways Act

Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw

Category: C P C

You missed