In view of the Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, the custom duty is to be calculated on the sale price and not on the duty as is payable on the date of deemed expiration of permitted period of warehouse. Such Circular of the Board is binding on the Revenue. Therefore, the custom duty has to be paid on the basis of sale proceeds realised
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. M/S. ASSOCIATED CONTAINER TERMINAL LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar, Hemant Gupta And Dinesh…
The matter is remitted to the trial court to decide the objection of admissibility of the document on account of being insufficiently stamped in light of the findings recorded, after evidence is led by the parties.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S. Z. ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. BIPIN BIHARI BEHERA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : S. Abdul Nazeer…
……..it is evident that the 1976 Rules prescribed that a licence had to be obtained for the purposes of storing Hexane of the quantity involved in the instant case, and the Appellant has failed to comply with this requirement………..In the absence of such a licence, the Appellant could not have lawfully stored Hexane…….Non disclosure…..Respondent was justified in repudiating the claim of the Appellant on this ground.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S BASPA ORGANICS LIMITED — Appellant Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and R. Subhash Reddy,…
Appellant has to be reinstated with continuity of service from the date of his initial appointment as full-time Gallery Attendant in July 2002, but without back wages for the period between 18.12.2012 to 22.08.2013, when the Appellant did not work. The Appellant shall, however, be entitled to differential salary, if any, between the post of full-time Gallery Attendant and part-time Gallery Attendant from 25th July 2002 onwards
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH VINOD RAVJIBHAI RAJPUT — Appellant Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and A.S. Bopanna, JJ. ) Civil…
Medical Professionals Should Not Be Dragged Into Criminal Proceedings Unless Negligence Of A High Order Is Shown: SC HELD in case of criminal negligence against a medical professional it must be shown that the accused did something or failed to do something in the given facts and circumstances of the case which no medical professional in his ordinary senses and prudence would have done or failed to do
Medical Professionals Should Not Be Dragged Into Criminal Proceedings Unless Negligence Of A High Order Is Shown: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 16 Feb 2020 7:22 PM The Supreme…
High Courts Are Not Precluded From Entertaining Writ Petitions Even If There Are Disputed Questions Of Facts, but if they do not require elaborate evidence to be adduced.: SC
High Courts Are Not Precluded From Entertaining Writ Petitions Even If There Are Disputed Questions Of Facts: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 16 Feb 2020 12:55 PM The Supreme…
Defence That ‘Cheque Issued As Security’ Not Believable In Absence Of Further Evidence To Rebut Presumption U/s 139 NI Act : SC
Defence That ‘Cheque Issued As Security’ Not Believable In Absence Of Further Evidence To Rebut Presumption U/s 139 NI Act : SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 14 Feb 2020…
Arbitration Clause In An Insufficiently Stamped Agreement Cannot Be Acted Upon By Court: SC
Arbitration Clause In An Insufficiently Stamped Agreement Cannot Be Acted Upon By Court: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 14 Feb 2020 9:56 PM The Supreme Court has observed that…
Discrepancies In Evidence Against Delinquent Not A Ground To Interfere With Findings Of Disciplinary Inquiry: SC
Discrepancies In Evidence Against Delinquent Not A Ground To Interfere With Findings Of Disciplinary Inquiry: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 15 Feb 2020 4:58 PM The Supreme Court has…
Findings Of Fact Cannot Be Interfered With In A Second Appeal Unless Findings Are Perverse, Reiterates SC
Findings Of Fact Cannot Be Interfered With In A Second Appeal Unless Findings Are Perverse, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 15 Feb 2020 5:45 PM The findings of…