Basic rule of criminal justice system is “bail, not jail”- Right to life and personal liberty- HELD the High Court should not foreclose itself from the exercise of the power when a citizen has been arbitrarily deprived of their personal liberty in an excess of state power.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ARNAB MANORANJAN GOSWAMI — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee,…
Admission – Super Specialty Medical Courses – Reservation – This Court direct that the counselling for admission to Super Specialty Medical Courses for the academic year 2020-2021 shall proceed on a date to be fixed by the competent authority without providing for reservations to in-service doctors for the academic year 2020-2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH DR. PRERIT SHARMA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. DR. BILU B.S. & ORS. — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and…
Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and Other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 – Advocates with experience of 10 years will be eligible for appointment as judicial members in tribunals – Members of Indian Legal Service will also be eligible for appointment as judicial members provided they fulfill same criteria as advocates.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATION — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and S. Ravindra…
(IPC) – Ss 34, 471, 468, 467, 420, 419 and 406 – Quashing of complaint – Criminal proceedings ought not to be scuttled at the initial stage – Quashing of a complaint should rather be an exception and a rarity than an ordinary rule.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SKODA AUTO VOLKSWAGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : S.A. Bobde, CJI.,…
Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Subordinate Services (General Branch) Rules, 1975- HELD To forestall any apprehensions as to which of the appointees would be senior, and if those from the earlier process are appointed later, the proviso clarifies that candidates from the earlier process would rank senior
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MANOHAR LAL JAT AND OTHERS ETC — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS ETC — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and…
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 50 – Commercial Courts Act, 2015 – Section 13(1) – Foreign award – Enforcement of – A further appeal by a party aggrieved by an order of enforcement, even under the later enacted Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is not maintainable
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NOY VALLESINA ENGINEERING SPA, (NOW KNOWN AS NOY AMBIENTE S.P.A) — Appellant Vs. JINDAL DRUGS LIMITED AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indira…
I Tax Act, 1961 – S 40(a)(iib) – CoI, 1950 – Art 226 – VAT expenditure is not allowable as deduction – When the vires of S 40(a)(iib) of the I T Act were challenged, which can be decided by the High Court alone in exercise of powers under Art 226, the H C ought to have decided the issue with regard to vires of S 40(a)(iib) on merits, irrespective of the fact whether the matter was sub judice before the Income Tax Authority
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH M/S TAMIL NADU STATE MARKETING CORPORATION LIMITED — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash…
Supreme Court Rules – Order 39 – Except for compelling factors and clear situation of deprivation of fair justice, the transfer power should not be invoked – Present bunch of cases are not perceived to be amongst such exceptional categories
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SINGLE BENCH JATINDERVEER ARORA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB RESPONDENT — Respondent ( Before : Hrishikesh Roy, J. ) Transfer Petition (Criminal) No.…
Charges proved against the Respondent “were of neglect of duty” which resulted in pecuniary loss to the Railways High Court was therefore not justified in setting aside the order of compulsory retirement
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. RAJENDRA KUMAR DUBEY — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud,…
Termination of contract – Refund of interest – HELD the impugned judgment erred in directing payment of interest on the entire amount from 08.11.1994; instead, the direction to pay interest on Rs. 3,61,20,000/- shall operate with effect from 22.03.1995 to 19.05.1998.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND VICE CHAIRMAN GUJARAT MARITIME BOARD — Appellant Vs. ASIATIC STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indira…







