Supreme Court of India Judgements

Illegal Gratification–In the absence of proof of demand, the question raising the presumption would not arose. Sanction–Sanctioning authority did not apply their mind to entire material on record–Sanction is vitiated in law.

Mar 28, 2017 sclaw

2007(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandeya Katju Appeal (Crl.) 970 of…

I P C

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 324 – Voluntary causing hurt – Involvement of accused – Injury specifically attributed to accused – Not supported by medical evidence – Accused acquitted.

Mar 25, 2017 sclaw

AIR 2003 SC 1110 : (2003) CriLJ 1277 : (2003) 2 JT 95 : (2003) 1 SCALE 7 : (2003) 2 SCC 257 : (2003) 1 SCR 10 :…

Rent

Eviction—Leave to Defend—Merits and De merits of ground raised are not to be examined—Only prima facie ground to defence which may result in favour of tenant is to be seen.

Mar 24, 2017 sclaw

2017(1) Law Herald (P&H) 426 (SC) : 2017 LawHerald.Org 583 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre…

Supreme Court of India Judgements

Latest Post

Under Sections 34/37 of Arbitration Act, 1996, courts lack power to modify awards but can set aside, partially set aside (sever) severable parts, or correct computational/clerical errors.

Courts must strictly enforce building laws, order demolition of unauthorized structures, and refuse regularization pleas from violators, upholding the rule of law.

Under Sections 34/37 of Arbitration Act, 1996, courts lack power to modify awards but can set aside, partially set aside (sever) severable parts, or correct computational/clerical errors.

Courts must strictly enforce building laws, order demolition of unauthorized structures, and refuse regularization pleas from violators, upholding the rule of law.

The Right to Life (Art 21) includes digital access; inaccessible digital KYC processes violate this and the RPwD Act, mandating regulators ensure accessible alternatives and reasonable accommodation.

An Arbitral Tribunal possesses the power under Section 16, Arbitration Act, 1996, based on consent principles in Sections 2(1)(h) & 7, to implead non-signatories bound by arbitration agreement.

Under Sections 34/37 of Arbitration Act, 1996, courts lack power to modify awards but can set aside, partially set aside (sever) severable parts, or correct computational/clerical errors.

Courts must strictly enforce building laws, order demolition of unauthorized structures, and refuse regularization pleas from violators, upholding the rule of law.

The Right to Life (Art 21) includes digital access; inaccessible digital KYC processes violate this and the RPwD Act, mandating regulators ensure accessible alternatives and reasonable accommodation.

An Arbitral Tribunal possesses the power under Section 16, Arbitration Act, 1996, based on consent principles in Sections 2(1)(h) & 7, to implead non-signatories bound by arbitration agreement.

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(d)(ii) – Deficiency in service – Any loss arising out of inaction and negligence on the part of the Bank, such deficiency is compensable under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Under Sections 34/37 of Arbitration Act, 1996, courts lack power to modify awards but can set aside, partially set aside (sever) severable parts, or correct computational/clerical errors.

Courts must strictly enforce building laws, order demolition of unauthorized structures, and refuse regularization pleas from violators, upholding the rule of law.

The Right to Life (Art 21) includes digital access; inaccessible digital KYC processes violate this and the RPwD Act, mandating regulators ensure accessible alternatives and reasonable accommodation.

An Arbitral Tribunal possesses the power under Section 16, Arbitration Act, 1996, based on consent principles in Sections 2(1)(h) & 7, to implead non-signatories bound by arbitration agreement.

Illegal Gratification–In the absence of proof of demand, the question raising the presumption would not arose. Sanction–Sanctioning authority did not apply their mind to entire material on record–Sanction is vitiated in law.

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 324 – Voluntary causing hurt – Involvement of accused – Injury specifically attributed to accused – Not supported by medical evidence – Accused acquitted.

Eviction—Leave to Defend—Merits and De merits of ground raised are not to be examined—Only prima facie ground to defence which may result in favour of tenant is to be seen.

You missed

Under Sections 34/37 of Arbitration Act, 1996, courts lack power to modify awards but can set aside, partially set aside (sever) severable parts, or correct computational/clerical errors.

Courts must strictly enforce building laws, order demolition of unauthorized structures, and refuse regularization pleas from violators, upholding the rule of law.

The Right to Life (Art 21) includes digital access; inaccessible digital KYC processes violate this and the RPwD Act, mandating regulators ensure accessible alternatives and reasonable accommodation.

An Arbitral Tribunal possesses the power under Section 16, Arbitration Act, 1996, based on consent principles in Sections 2(1)(h) & 7, to implead non-signatories bound by arbitration agreement.

Supreme Court of India Judgements