Service Law—Retrial Benefits—Counting of past service—Respondent not entitled as the requirements of statute dealing with subject not fulfilled.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2780 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.P. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Civil Appeal No. 4102 of 2007…
Service Law—Stoppage of increment–Major penalty–In the absence of specific Regulations, withholding of increments with cumulative effect is treated as a major penalty because it has a perpetual effect.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2775 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Civil Appeal No. 4041-42…
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 304B – Dowry death – Dying declaration – Deceased was fed up with activities of her husband and she poured kerosene oil on herself and burnt herself – Dying declaration of deceased as well as evidence of PW are sufficient to establish that appellant used to fight on petty issues and give beatings deceased
(2013) 11 AD 453 : AIR 2014 SC 227 : (2013) 14 JT 357 : (2013) 4 RCR(Criminal) 964 : (2013) 13 SCALE 410 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION…
the High Court set aside the order of termination – Court find that the respondent was given a copy of the order of cancellation of the certificate passed by the Tahsildar, Nowrangpur and he also signed in lieu of the receipt of the copy of the said order. In view of the fact that the petitioner was given a copy of the order of cancellation of certificate the High Court was not justified in holding that the respondent was not confronted with the order of cancellation of certificate. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent then urged that the respondent was denied an opportunity of personal hearing before the disciplinary authority – Appeal allowed.
(2000) 1 LLJ 275 : (1999) 9 SCC 268 : (1999) SCC(L&S) 1228 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. LUTHER KONDHPAN —…
Service Law – Appointment – Search-cum- Selection Committee, after scrutinizing qualification and experience of short- Listed candidates, unanimously placed Respondent first in merit list – Acceptance of lesser salary cannot ipso facto conclude that acceptance of position was to abuse authority
(2013) 12 AD 157 : (2014) 1 CompLJ 39 : (2013) 14 JT 563 : (2013) 13 SCALE 442 : (2014) 2 SCC 609 : (2014) 1 SCC(L&S) 433…
High Court was to remit the matter to the Government for Constitution of the DPC to consider his fitment for promotion in later period, in that event, the DPC would go into the merits afresh and find out whether the respondent would be fit for promotion. If he would be found fit and recommendation is made in that behalf, the Government would appoint him on regular basis and he would get seniority only from the date of his promotion
(1997) 10 JT 628 : (1997) 3 SCALE 337 : (1997) 4 SCC 424 : (1997) SCC(L&S) 975 : (1997) 2 SCR 1133 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Section – 482 – Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section – 420, 468, 471 – Application for modification of the order
(2005) 9 SCC 161 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SURENDRA KUMAR — Respondent ( Before : B. P. Singh, J; Arun…
The Respondent would not have any right to get any further advantage in the nature of higher salary or a higher pay scale, especially when nothing from his salary was being deducted on account of his getting pension or perquisites from the earlier employer – The Tribunal was absolutely right in coming to the conclusion that the pay fixation under the order was correct because a mistake was committed in the earlier pay fixation – Appeal stands disposed of.
(2013) 11 AD 499 : (2014) 140 FLR 7 : (2013) 14 JT 203 : (2014) LabIC 1564 : (2014) 1 LLN 17 : (2013) 13 SCALE 393 :…
If any such action is taken, vis-a-vis those who are residing outside the campus by taking advantage of the order passed by the High Court, it would be open to them to go to the High Court and place the necessary material before the High Court for consideration. The High Court would look into the individual cases and pass appropriate orders according to law – Appeals disposed of.
(1997) 3 JT 725 : (1997) 3 SCALE 175 : (1997) 4 SCC 444 : (1997) 2 SCR 623 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JAI MANGLA HARIJAN KALYAN SAMITI —…
Once the land was allotted to the appellant and had become his property it loses the character of being ‘evacuee property’ thereafter; the Collector has, therefore, rightly taken note of the subsequent acquisition of land by the appellant under Section 14-B and recomputed the excess land – Appeal dismissed.
(2001) 4 JT 419 : (2001) 9 SCC 734 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before…