Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 – Sections 58 and 86 – Allotment of land – considered view that directing the Indore Development Authority to revisit the matter afresh at this stage when the lease deed of the plot has been executed and the appellant has raised construction – No purpose.
We are of the considered view that directing the Indore Development Authority to revisit the matter afresh at this stage when the lease deed of the plot has been executed…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 120B, 467, 467 read with 471, 420, 477A – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) –
We are not able to trace out any evidence in respect of dishonesty/misuse in obtaining loan without furnishing any security. In our view the prosecution has failed to prove beyond…
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 7 Rule 10 and 10A – Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34 – Setting aside arbitral award – Period of limitation –
In such circumstance, in the fact situation wherein the issue of delay had arisen only in the context of the delay of 8 days in re-presentation as permitted by the…
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Section 16(1)(c) – Suit for specific performance of agreement – Readiness and willingness – The application for extension of time made after expiry of the time prescribed is sufficient evidence for the incapacity of the plaintiff to perform his obligations demonstrating readiness and willingness
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAVI SETIA — Appellant Vs. MADAN LAL AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Navin Sinha and Indira Banerjee, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No(s).…
Conviction under Section 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) – The appellants were undoubtedly the members of an unlawful assembly some of whom were also armed with spears and assaulted the deceased. All the accused surrounded the deceased obviously to prevent his escape.The fact that the co-accused may have assaulted on the head again cannot be considered very relevant to eschew the absence of common object.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH FAINUL KHAN — Appellant Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND — Respondent ( Before : Navin Sinha and B.R. Gavai, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No(s). 937…
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 9A (inserted by the Maharashtra Amendment Act, 1977) – word “jurisdiction” – include the issue of limitation as the expression has been used in the broader sense and is not restricted to conventional definition under pecuniary or territorial jurisdiction
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH NUSLI NEVILLE WADIA — Appellant Vs. IVORY PROPERTIES AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Arun Mishra, M.R. Shah and B.R. Gavai, JJ. )…
Date Of Coming Into Force Of IBC Wholly Irrelevant To The Triggering Of Any Limitation For Applications: SC
Date Of Coming Into Force Of IBC Wholly Irrelevant To The Triggering Of Any Limitation For Applications: SC We had also made it clear beyond any doubt that for applications…
Candidates Must Also Disclose Criminal Cases In Which Cognizance Has Been Taken By Court “……….information should be furnished in Form 26, which includes information concerning cases in which a competent Court has taken cognizance (Entry 5(ii) of Form 26).” CM, Maharashtra case.
"..........information should be furnished in Form 26, which includes information concerning cases in which a competent Court has taken cognizance (Entry 5(ii) of Form 26). This is apart from and…
Power Of Attorney Holder Cannot Depose In Respect Of Matters Which The Principal Alone Have Personal Knowledge.
The attorney holder cannot dispose of matter which are in personal knowledge of principal and be cross-examined on such points. ” it was held that a power of attorney holder,…
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 142 – Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 – Section 3(1) – Appointment – Reservation – Power under Article 142 of the Constitution are plenary in nature, the same cannot be construed to mean that the power can be used to supplant the substantive law applicable to the case
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ANUPAL SINGH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : R.…