Housing – Allotment of plot – Non-Participation of Allotment Process – Availability of the plot does not give any entitlement to a person who has no right to claim allotment – Any allotment has to be made in accordance with the procedure prescribed and the Rules of the Parishad
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH U.P. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. NAMIT SHARMA — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ.…
Illegal gratification – presumption of innocence as would be there in the case of acquittal – High Court decision is based on totally erroneous view of law by ignoring the settled legal position – High Court in dealing/non – dealing with the evidence was patently illegal leading to grave miscarriage of justice – Matter deserves to be remanded
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH STATE OF GUJARAT — Appellant Vs. BHALCHANDRA LAXMISHANKAR DAVE — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M. R. Shah, JJ.…
Migration – Regulation clearly lays down a restriction of migration from an unrecognised college to a recognised college – Regulation 6(2) provides that migration is permissible only if both the Colleges are recognised u/s 11(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. ANCHAL PARIHAR AND OTHERS. — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and Indira Banerjee, JJ. )…
IBC – – Held, Exclusion under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is related not to the debt itself but to the relationship existing between a related party financial creditor and the corporate debtor – As such, the financial creditor who in praesenti is not a related party, would not be debarred from being a member of the Committee of Creditors
1/37 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED — Appellant Vs. SPADE FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indu…
Bail granted – the presence of statutory restrictions like Section 43D (5) of UAPA perse does not oust the ability of Constitutional Courts to grant bail on grounds of violation of Part III of the Constitution –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH UNION OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. K.A. NAJEEB — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
(CrPC) – Section 482 – Complainant does not even remember the place or the address – Complainant refused to undergo a medical examination – quashing petition expeditiously
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SANAM GUPTA — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER. — Respondent ( Before : Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ. )…
Remedies for enforcement of rights – Whether a particular device should be adopted for controlling air pollution is a matter of policy which lies within the domain of the statutory authorities concerned
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MADAN MOHAN MANOCHA — Appellant Vs. CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD (CPCB) AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah,…
Recording of Reasons – It is not necessary in the matter below to record elaborate reasons but since these matters are carried forward to this Court, the reasons, albeit brief, have to be recorded to facilitate this Court to understand
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SUNITA AGRAWAL — Appellant Vs. BHANWARLAL AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…
Succession certificate – Transfer of proceedings – Parties shall produce the copy of the Settlement Agreement and the copy of this order before the Court where the proceedings are pending or before the Authorities who hold the properties of the deceased or the companies which owe money or in which shares are held by the deceased, so that they act accordingly to the satisfaction of both the parties
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SINGLE BENCH KRITI AGARWAL — Appellant Vs. VEENA RASTOGI — Respondent ( Before : V. Ramasubramanian, J. ) Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 166 of 2019 Decided…
Suit for injunction – Trespasser, who is in established possession of the property could obtain injunction – – rightful owner does not come forward and assert his title by the process of law within the period prescribed by the provisions of Limitation applicable to the case, his right is for ever extinguished and the possessory owner acquires an absolute title.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH A. SUBRAMANIAN AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. R. PANNERSELVAM — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah, JJ. )…









