IMP ::: HELD “People suffering from disabilities are also socially backward, are therefore, at the very least, entitled to the same benefits as given to the Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes candidates.”
Disabled Entitled To The Same Benefits As Given To SC-ST Candidates: SC [Read Order] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 13 July 2020 8:58 AM “People suffering from disabilities are also socially backward”…
IN RE : COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION Held it is hereby ordered that all periods of limitation prescribed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 shall be extended with effect from 15.03.2020 till further orders to be passed by this Court in the present proceedings.
1 ITEM NO.6 Virtual Court 1 SECTION PIL-W …
IMP:: Interaction with Advocate Sahil Mongia, (9818656542), Petitioner in IA filed before Honble SCOI, RE [Suo Motu Limitation] SC Allows Service Through Instant Tele-Messenger Services Like Whatsapp, Email & Fax
Had an interesting interaction with Advocate Sahil Mongia, Advocate (9818656542) Co-petitioner, in the IA filed before Honble SCOI, RE [Suo Motu Limitation] SC Allows Service Through Instant Tele-Messenger Services Like…
Accident Law–Learner’s Licence–Only because the appellant held a learner’s licence which had expired and was not valid on the date of accident, he cannot be said to be duly licensed.
2009(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 849 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Mukundakam Sharma Civil Appeal No.1537 of 2009…
Criminal Appeal Against Order Of Conviction Cannot Be Dismissed For Default: Reiterates SC HELD We, therefore, set aside the judgment and order dated 22.04.2014 and remand the matter to be disposed of on merits. Meanwhile, considering that the appellant has been in jail for a period of almost 11 years, we grant bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Criminal Appeal Against Order Of Conviction Cannot Be Dismissed For Default: Reiterates SC [Read Order] Ashok Kini 10 July 2020 7:32 PM The Supreme Court recently set aside a Madras…
Illegal gratification–Mere recovery of tainted money divorced from the circumstances under which it is paid is not sufficient to convict the accused when the substantive evidence in the case is not reliable
2009(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 789 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta The Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.Sudershan Reddy Criminal Appeal No. 377 of…
Jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred in respect of grant of a relief for setting aside a deed of gift in terms of Section 49 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953
2009(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 785 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Mukundakam Sharma Civil Appeal No.1078 Of 2009…
SC Nullifies Post-March 31 Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles ; Bars Registration Of Such Vehicles
SC Nullifies Post-March 31 Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles ; Bars Registration Of Such Vehicles [Read Order] Sanya Talwar 9 July 2020 4:43 PM The Supreme Court on Wednesday recalled its March…
Object of Order VII Rule 11 (a) CPC is that if in a suit, no cause of action is disclosed, or the suit is barred by limitation under Rule 11 (d), the Court would not permit the plaintiff to unnecessarily protract the proceedings in the suit. It states that the plaint “shall” be rejected if any of the grounds specified in clause (a) to (e) are made out. Hence suit filed after 3 years of registered deed is barred under, Art 59 Limitation Act.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DAHIBEN — Appellant Vs. ARVINDBHAI KALYANJI BHANUSALI (GAJRA)(D) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and Indu Malhotra,…
IMP ::: Pleadings–Court should confine its decision to the question raised in pleadings–Court cannot grant a relief which is not claimed and which does not flow from the facts and the cause of action alleged in the plaint.
2009(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 745 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendaran The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Civil Appeal Nos. 5798-5799 of…








