Limitation Act, 1963 – Article 137 – Arbitration & C A , 1996 – Ss 47 & 49 – Period of limitation for filing a petition for enforcement of a foreign award under Ss 47 & 49, would be governed by Art 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, three years when right to sue accrues
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH GOVERNMENT OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. VEDANTA LIMITED (FORMERLY CAIRN INDIA LTD.), AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : S. Abdul Nazeer, Indu…
“In a criminal matter, where the life and liberty of a person is in question, one right of appeal has always been accepted and appropriate steps must be taken to effectuate that right.” The considerations on account of delay and limitation ought not to negate the right of appeal inhering in an accused
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.)NO. OF 2020 (Arising out of Review Petition(Crl.)D.No.4235 of 2020) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2019…
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 – Ss 20 and 23(3) – Maintenance – An unmarried Hindu daughter can claim maintenance from her father till she is married relying on Section 20(3) of the Act, 1956, provided she pleads and proves that she is unable to maintain herself
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ABHILASHA — Appellant Vs. PARKASH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah, JJ. ) Criminal…
NDPS – (CrPC) – Ss 313 – Power to examine the accused. – Where accused offers false answers in examination u/S 313 Cr.PC, same also can be used against him. Merely because independent witnesses are not examined, same is no ground to reject the case of the prosecution.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH JEET RAM — Appellant Vs. THE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, CHANDIGARH — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah,…
NDPS – COVID – Bail granted – HELD “There is no doubt that the rigors of Section 37 would have to be met before the sentence of a convict is suspended and bail granted and mere passage of time cannot be a reason for the same.”
“In our opinion, the stated circumstances may be relevant for grant of bail in matters arising out of conviction under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 etc. but are not…
Advance Tax Ruling System – Aim of any properly framed advance ruling system ought to be a dialogue between taxpayers and revenue authorities to fulfil the mutually beneficial purpose for taxpayers and revenue authorities HELD Swedish model and the New Zealand system may be a possible way forward.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — Appellant Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-V — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Indu Malhotra,…
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – IPC , 1860 – Evidence Act, 1872 – Ss 165 – Constitution of India, Art 14 – Corruption Charges – Punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the allegation of corruption, is without merit – It is a settled legal proposition that the Disciplinary Authority has wide discretion in imposing punishment for a proved delinquency, subject to principles of proportionality and fair play
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH PRAVIN KUMAR — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, S. Abdul Nazeer and Surya Kant,…
Writ Petition to Supreme Court of India, Not Maintainable Against Judicial Order Passed By High Court
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transferred Case (Criminal) No 1 of 2020 Neelam Manmohan Attavar …Petitioner(s) Versus Manmohan Attavar (D) Thr LRs …Respondent(s) O R…
N D P S Act, 1985 – Ss 20(b)(ii)(B) & 50 – Possession 20 kg – Ganja from the motor cycle – NDPS Trial is not vitiated merely because ownership of Vehicle from which Contraband was seized is not established – It is enough to establish and prove that the contraband articles were found from the accused from the vehicle purchased by the accused
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH RIZWAN KHAN — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah, JJ.…
Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 – S 45 – Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Employees Corporation Pension Regulations, 1989 – Regulations 3, 3(1), 3(k) and 43 – Rejection of pension – HELD Merely because the respondent had withdrawn the entire CPF amount prior to his absorption would not make any difference because the CPF account was closed by the Board on the employee’s absorption – Appeal dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. GOVERDHAN LAL SONI AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and…









