HELD The findings of the MCI on the conduct of Respondent 1 forms basis for the court to hold a case of medical negligence leading to deficiency in his services. Judgment of the N C D R C, set aside.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH HARNEK SINGH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. GURMIT SINGH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Pamidighantam…
NOIDA is not a financial creditor, it would constitute an operational creditor. Appeal dismissed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — Appellant Vs. ANAND SONBHADRA — Respondent ( Before : K.M. Joseph And Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 – Rule 119(2) – Restoration of the forfeited property -The appellant taking benefit of the said amendment filed the applications on 30.09.2000 and 05.10.2000 seeking for restoration, which were well within the time prescribed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. G. RAMANARAYANA JOSHI — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and A.S. Bopanna, JJ.…
Compromise decree – No appeal would lie – to avoid the terms of a consent decree party has to establish, before the Court that passed the same, that the agreement, is invalid or illegal. HELD terms of a compromise cannot be avoided, unless the allegation of fraud has been proved
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH K. SRINIVASAPPA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. M. MALLAMMA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil…
Benefit of Doubt – For bringing home the guilt of the accused, prosecution has to firstly prove negligence and then establish direct nexus between negligence of the accused and the death of the victim – Appeal Allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH NANJUNDAPPA AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, CJI, Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli, JJ.…
When an exparte decree is set aside – the defendants cannot be relegated to the position prior to the date of hearing of the suit when he was placed exparte – cannot file written statement but can cross examine witnesses & argue the matter.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SUDHIR RANJAN PATRA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. HIMANSU SEKHAR SRICHANDAN AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah…
While quashing the criminal proceedings “No useful purpose will be served by prolonging the proceedings of the case” cannot be a good ground and/or a ground at all to quash the criminal proceedings
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SATISH KUMAR JATAV — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.…
HELD the medical condition was kept in view by the No.1 Selection Board and all competent authorities, in the backdrop of employability and there is no other additional medical disability acquired by the respondent during the period of time lag, if any.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. BRIGADIER JAVED IQBAL — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and A.S. Bopanna, JJ. ) Civil…
Postponement of NEET-PG 2022 Examination – HELD Postponement of exams results in chaos and uncertainty
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH DR R. DINESH KUMAR REDDY AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE (MCC) AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y.…
Endosulfan – State Government has not disclosed what steps it has taken to provide for medical treatment and rehabilitation to these victims – HELD the delay is appalling, the inaction is in breach of the orders of this court.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH BAIJU KG AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. DR V P JOY — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and Surya Kant, JJ.…