Auction – Bank guarantee – procedure and guidelines laid down by the ASC and that being a part of the auction notice, the appellant was under obligation to comply with and despite opportunity the appellant has failed to comply with both the twin conditions – High Court rightly set aside the auction – Appeal dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAJIV KUMAR JINDAL AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. BCI STAFF COLONY RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and…
Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 – Section 16-FF – held that the selection process concludes only after the mandatory approval of the District Inspector of Schools is granted – there is no rule for a deemed appointment.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. RACHNA HILLS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI.…
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Section 31 – an action instituted under Section 31 of the Specific Relief for cancellation of an instrument is not an action in rem.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S. ASIAN AVENUES PVT LTD. — Appellant SRI SYED SHOUKAT HUSSAIN — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. )…
Environmental Law – Mining activities within an area of one kilometre of the boundary of the Protected Areas will be hazardous for the wildlife.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Vikram Nath and…
By the very nature of the science that they practice and with the advancement of science and modern medical technology, the emergency duty that Allopathy doctors are capable of performing and the trauma care that they are capable of providing, cannot be performed by Ayurved doctors – both categories of doctors are certainly not performing equal work to be entitled to equal pay
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS ETC. — Appellant Vs. DR. P. A. BHATT AND OTHERS ETC. — Respondent ( Before : V. Ramasubramanian and…
Right of default bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC is not merely a statutory right, but a fundamental right that flows from Article 21 of the Constitution of India – During the pendency of the investigation, supplementary chargesheets were filed by the Investigation Agency just before the expiry of 60 days – Interim order of bail is upheld.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RITU CHHABARIA — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Krishna Murari and C. T. Ravikumar, JJ. ) Writ…
Clarification of order – Applicant cannot be permitted to seek clarification of the order by way of an intervention as the same is a matter to be considered by the concerned court, where the proceedings in respect of the applicant is pending.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MUKUL AGARWAL AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Krishna Murari and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ.…
Clarification of order – Applicant cannot be permitted to seek clarification of the order by way of an intervention as the same is a matter to be considered by the concerned court, where the proceedings in respect of the applicant is pending.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH VIJAY KUMAR GHAI AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Krishna Murari and Ahsanuddin Amanullah,…
HELD in the nature of the transaction, and what was actually sold by the Official Liquidator, plant and machinery, such as would answer the description of immovable property, must also be found part of the property for the purpose of the stamp duty and other charges as per law.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE SUB REGISTRAR, AMUDALAVALASA AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. M/S DANKUNI STEELS LTD. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh…
N D P S Act, 1985 – Section 8(c) read with Sections 21(c), 27A, 28 and Section 29 – Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 25 – Confessional statements were made by the accused to an police officer empowered under Section 53 of the NDPS Act and hence, bar of Section 25 of the Evidence Act, the confessional statements will have to be kept out of consideration – Prosecution has not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellants
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH BOTHILAL — Appellant Vs. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. ) Criminal…