Complainant has attempted to turn a purely contractual dispute between the parties into a criminal case – Not only that, there is an inordinate delay in lodging the complaint – Complaint does not disclose that any of the ingredients of the offence complained of have been made out – Complaint bearing filed before the trial court under Section 403, 406, 420 and 120B of the IPC is dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PRAKASH AGGARWAL — Appellant Vs. GANESH BENZOPLAST LIMITED AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
(IPC) – Sections 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 read with 120B – False document – Gurudwara Election – Quashing of summoning order – Making a false claim and creating and producing the false document both are different and distinct – Summoning order is set aside – Appeal allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SHRI SUKHBIR SINGH BADAL — Appellant Vs. BALWANT SINGH KHERA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. )…
Order passed by the learned Single Judge as well as the impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court directing to pay additional 2% in addition to the existing pay to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer (Electrical) from the date of their initial appointment is/are hereby quashed and set aside.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SRI. B. G. MANAMOHANA PRIYANKA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah…
Appointment to post of Sub Inspector of Police – Eligibility – Remanded to DB of HC that it will be open for the Division Bench to call for the expert’s opinion on the questions of which their answers were alleged to be incorrect for which the objections were raised so that if ultimately it is found that the answers with respect to some questions were incorrect and consequently, the marks are added and they may become eligible.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SACHIT KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS ETC. ETC. — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS ETC. ETC. — Respondent ( Before : M.R.…
Medical evidence would further reveal that the appellants have not acted in a brutal manner, inasmuch as there is only single injury inflicted on both the deceased – Conviction under Section 302 IPC is maintained, the sentence of capital punishment is commuted to life imprisonment –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH DIGAMBAR — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 173(3) read with Section 158 does not permit the Secretary (Home) to order for further investigation / reinvestigation by another agency, other than the officer in charge of the concerned Police Station and/or his superior officer.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH BOHATIE DEVI (DEAD) THROUGH LR — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T.…
Suit for specific performance – Agreement to sell – where the sum named is an amount the payment of which may be substituted for the performance of the act at the election of the person by whom the money is to be paid or the act done, the Court may refuse to pass the decree for specific performance. In the present case, the condition specifically stipulates that in case of failure on the part of the seller to execute the sale deed within the stipulated time the buyer shall be entitled to double the amount given as an advance.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH T.D. VIVEK KUMAR AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. RANBIR CHAUDHARY — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
Work Charged Establishment Revised Service Conditions (Repealing) Rules, 2013 – Rule 5(v) – Pension – after rendering of service as work charged for number of years and thereafter when their services have been regularized, they cannot be denied the pension on the ground that they have not completed the qualifying service for pension – That is why, the service rendered as work charged is to be counted and/or considered for the purpose of qualifying service for pension
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UDAY PRATAP THAKUR AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar,…
Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 – Sections 15(2-A) and 41 – Completion Certificate – the intention of the Act is to levy only those charges/fees provided/mentioned under Section 15(2-A) of the Act, 1973, otherwise the other charges also would have been defined under the Act, 1973. Levy of such other charges can be said to be hit by Article 265 of the Constitution of India
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MATHURA VRINDAVAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER — Appellant RAJESH SHARMA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. )…
Once the respondents were permanently absorbed and became an employee of the Dairy Development Corporation / Milk Federation Unions, they ceased to have the lien with the State Government and therefore, they shall not be entitled to the pensionary benefits as State Government employees
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. DR. HAMIR SINGH CHOUHAN (DEAD) BY LRS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah…