Skip to content
  • June 26, 2025 10:17 pm
Supreme Court of India  Judgements

Supreme Court of India Judgements

46800 Judgements hosted as on 24/06/2025 - Search (FREE), Subscribe, Read & Download

  • Home
  • TELEGRAM SEARCH BOT
  • Facebook
  • Pricing
  • Login
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Refund
Top Tags
  • Land acquisition police assistance
  • service matters
  • state laws
  • acquittal

Latest Post

Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries. Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery. High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.
C P C

Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well

Jun 24, 2025 sclaw
Consumer

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation

Jun 12, 2025 sclaw
C P C

Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well

Jun 24, 2025 sclaw
Consumer

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation

Jun 12, 2025 sclaw
Constitution

Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.

Jun 11, 2025 sclaw
C P C Railways Act

Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
Cr P C

High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Trending
Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well
C P C
Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Consumer
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Constitution
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
C P C Railways Act
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
Army Rules, 1954 – Rule 13(3)(III)(v) – Discharge from service – Offences for which the red ink entries are awarded, cannot be said to be such gross mis­conduct which would make the appellant indiscipline and liable to be discharged from service and that too, after a period of long service rendered by him – Order of discharge is wholly unjustified and not sustainable at law – Appeal allowed.
Service
Army Rules, 1954 – Rule 13(3)(III)(v) – Discharge from service – Offences for which the red ink entries are awarded, cannot be said to be such gross mis­conduct which would make the appellant indiscipline and liable to be discharged from service and that too, after a period of long service rendered by him – Order of discharge is wholly unjustified and not sustainable at law – Appeal allowed.
(IPC) – Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent -‘criminal breach of trust’ is defined under Section 405 IPC which provides, inter alia, that whoever being in any manner entrusted with property or with any dominion over a property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property contrary to law, or in violation of any law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or contravenes any legal contract, express or implied, etc. shall be held to have committed criminal breach of trust
Acquittal
(IPC) – Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent -‘criminal breach of trust’ is defined under Section 405 IPC which provides, inter alia, that whoever being in any manner entrusted with property or with any dominion over a property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property contrary to law, or in violation of any law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or contravenes any legal contract, express or implied, etc. shall be held to have committed criminal breach of trust
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(d)(ii) – Deficiency in service – Any loss arising out of inaction and negligence on the part of the Bank, such deficiency is compensable under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(d)(ii) – Deficiency in service – Any loss arising out of inaction and negligence on the part of the Bank, such deficiency is compensable under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Termination–Reservation–In advertisement, authorities failed to mention in regard to reservation for handicapped person at the outset–Appellants who were handicapped person were appointed–On Contempt petition State cancelled the selection and terminated the service–Service restored with backwages.
Service
Termination–Reservation–In advertisement, authorities failed to mention in regard to reservation for handicapped person at the outset–Appellants who were handicapped person were appointed–On Contempt petition State cancelled the selection and terminated the service–Service restored with backwages.
Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well
C P C
Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Consumer
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Constitution
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
C P C Railways Act
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
Constitution

Contempt–The Majesty of the Court and the Rule of Law can never be maintained unless Supreme Court ensures meticulous compliance of its orders.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1052 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.N. Agrawal Dalveer Bhandari The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Civil Appeal…

Constitution

Contempt Petition–An innovative defence that they did not realize the implications of the order passed by Supreme Court–Unacceptable.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC)  1045 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Chief Justice of India The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. A.R. Lakshmanan Contempt Petition Civil No.…

Evidence Act

Criminal Trial—Criminal cases are decided on facts and circumstances on evidence rather than on case law and precedents.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) Law Herald (SC) 1040 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.K. Thakker The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Criminal Appeal No.141 of…

Land Acquisition

Compensation—Apportionment of—It is not permissible to deal with matter covered under Section 30 of the Act while dealing with a reference in terms of Section 18 of the Act.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) Law Herald (SC) 1035 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Civil Appeal No. 5354 of…

I P C

Private defence—Right of—Where accused party was the aggressor it could not claim right of self defence and such right does not include a right to launch an offensive or aggression.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) Law Herald (SC) 1028 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 143 of…

Rent

Eviction—The order of eviction could not been passed in a summary way without adjudicating the question whether the tenant had any defence available.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1026 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Civil Appeal No. 895…

Corporate Limitation

Common Carrier—Non delivery of consignment—No liability to pay freight charges—Entire cost of consignment to be paid by carrier.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. V. Raveendran Civil Appeal No. 3096…

Service Matters
Service

Service Law—Departmental proceeding is quasi criminal in nature. Service Law—Absence from duty—Dismissal from service—In case of habitual absence, a punishment of dismissal of service is just.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 928 of…

Limitation

Adverse Possession— Adverse possession or ouster is an inference to be drawn from the facts proved. Adverse Possession—He has to plead the period and the date from which he claims to be in possession—He has to show a hostile title to the real owner of land.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. H. Kapadia Civil Appeal No.…

C P C

Revisional Jurisdiction—Finding of fact not to be interfered by High Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction.

Apr 8, 2017 sclaw

  2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 999 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 920 of…

Posts pagination

1 … 699 700 701 … 715
Login Status
Forgot?  Register
Categories
Archives
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

You missed

C P C

Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well

Jun 24, 2025 sclaw
Consumer

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation

Jun 12, 2025 sclaw
Constitution

Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.

Jun 11, 2025 sclaw
C P C Railways Act

Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
Supreme Court of India  Judgements

Supreme Court of India Judgements

46800 Judgements hosted as on 24/06/2025 - Search (FREE), Subscribe, Read & Download