Exceptional circumstances arise and it becomes necessary to disassociate a member from the list, it will be open to the Director to do so. However, reasons for disassociation shall be intimated to this Court in a sealed cover without any delay
(2013) 9 SCALE 293 : (2014) 3 SCC 166 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MANOHAR LAL SHARMA — Appellant Vs. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before :…
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section – 4(1), 23(1) – Stamp Act – Section – 48 – Enhancement of the compensation – The High Court by the impugned judgment dated 22nd August, 1989 made in R.F.A. No52/89 and batch uniformly enhanced the market value to Rs. 12,000/- per bigha – Court has considered the entire gamut of the operation of the relevant provisions of Stamps Act and held that the fixation by the Government of the amount under Stamp Act for fiscal purpose bears no relevance to determine the market value
(1995) 4 SCALE 726 : (1995) 5 SCC 310 : (1995) 2 SCR 572 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PAINDER SINGH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI)…
Appellant, a professor in Physics was appointed as Vice-Chancellor of Mysore University – Immediately another order passed rescinding earlier order as he had been facing a criminal case – This order had been passed immediately and much before the date on which appointment could become effective – There was no necessity to give him an opportunity
AIR 1999 SC 849 : (1998) 8 JT 344 : (1998) 6 SCALE 378 : (1999) 1 SCC 422 : (1999) SCC(L&S) 229 : (1998) 3 SCR 165 Supp…
A lawyer, no doubt has a duty towards his client to do his best in his interest but within the parameters of law – He at the same time is equally responsible to assist the court fairly on the exact and latest position of law to his knowledge – His right to debate in the court is no licence to sidetrack the issue and mislead or pressurise the court to act in a particular manner – If he does so, it amounts of his misconduct attracting the wrath of disciplinary provisions of the Advocates Act.
AIR 2001 SC 457 : (2000) 3 JT 505 Supp : (2000) 8 SCALE 76 : (2001) 2 SCC 221 : (2000) 5 SCR 345 Supp : (2001) 1…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 364-A – Abduction – Conveyance of demand of ransom – Abduction of victim, a college student – Accused persons told him that they will ask his father to pay a huge amount for his release – Victim managed to escape and informed villagers – Accused arrested on the spot – Demand of ransom has already been made by conveying it to victim
(2004) CriLJ 4645 : (2004) 8 JT 72 : (2004) 7 SCALE 671 : (2004) 8 SCC 95 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MALLESHI — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA…
There are no cogent materials upon which the subjective satisfaction of the detaining Authority that the detenu was likely to be released on bail was arrived at; and there was a delay of 6 days in forwarding representation to the Central government – All the procedural requirements of Article 22 are mandatory in character and even if one of the procedural requirements is not complied with, the order of detention would be rendered illegal
(2010) 10 JT 456(1) : (2010) 10 SCALE 248 : (2010) 9 SCC 618 : (2010) 10 UJ 5119 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SMT. PEBAM NINGOL MIKOI DEVI —…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Section 439 – Constitution of India – Article 21 – Bail – Cancellation – Accused cannot be granted bail only on the ground that he was in custody for seven months – Individual liberty is restricted by larger social interest and its deprivation must have due sanction of law.
(2012) CriLJ 4670 : (2012) 4 JCC 2909 : (2012) 9 JT 155 : (2013) 1 RCR(Criminal) 277 : (2012) 9 SCALE 165 : (2012) 9 SCC 446 SUPREME COURT…
Having considered the prayer of the Petitioner for transfer in its proper perspective in the light of relevant pleadings of the parties, Court is of the opinion that no case for transfer of cases to the CBI is made out by the Petitioner. Allegations of bias are not substantiated
(2014) 9 SCALE 364 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PRADEEP N. SHARMA — Appellant Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT — Respondent ( Before : Ranjana Prakash Desai, J; N.V. Ramana, J…
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 – Sections 15 and 29 – Escheat of property – Intestate of death of female Hindu becoming full owner of the property – The failure of heirs must mean total absence of heirs before property can be escheated.
AIR 1991 SC 2301 : (1992) 102 PLR 102 : (1991) 1 SCR 458 Supp : (1991) 2 UJ 754 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF PUNJAB — Appellant…
Bail–Grant of–Telgi Stamp scam–Help by Inspector of Police–Question whether it is a organised crime to be decided during trial–Bail upheld.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2610 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. G. Balakrishnan, CJI The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan Criminal Appeal No.…