Payment of No. 35 per month to UDCs discharging special duties of onerous nature, is personal pay so long as they discharge the same. Therefore, other UDCs who do not perform the special duties, though seniors, do not ipso facto get the same pay on the posit of equal pay due to juniors getting higher pay
(1996) 1 AD 980 : (1996) 83 ELT 485 : (1996) 1 JT 709 : (1996) 1 SCALE 696 : (1996) 7 SCC 275 : (1996) 1 SCR 841 :…
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, the High Court ought not to have taken a strict view of the matter because the delay was not deliberate and there was nothing on the record to show that the appellant had acquiesced in the matter
(1998) 8 SCC 698 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MANICKRAM — Appellant Vs. BALUKHAN — Respondent ( Before : A. M. Ahmadii, C.J; Sujata V. Manohar, J; B. N. Kirpal,…
Temporary Employee should be given equal Salary as Regular Employee
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:- Jagdish Singh Khehar and S.A. Bobde, JJ. Civil Appeal No. 213 Of 2013. D/d. 26.10.2016. State of Punjab & Ors. – Appellants Versus Jagjit Singh…
Quashment—High Court quashed the summoning orders by relying on statements of witness recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C.—Whether proper ? NO.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2420 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.P. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeP.K. Balasubramanyan Criminal Appeal No. 1019 of 2007…
Disproportionate assets—Conviction–Court have analysed the evidence in great details as the valuation of the properties—Appeal dismissed.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2444 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeP.P. Naolekar Civil Appeal No. 1262 of 2001…
House Tax— State Government has given exemption to the self occupied residential houses from the payment of house tax—But not to self occupied commercial premises—Whether proper ? YES. Jurisdiction of High Court— The court cannot usurp the functions assigned to the legislative bodies under the Constitution and even indirectly require the legislature to exercise its power of law making in particular manner.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2429 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeB. Sudershan Reddy Civil Appeal No. 684 of…
Murder— Extra judicial confession not believed—Appeal against acquittal dismissed.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2427 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.P. Naolekar Criminal Appeal No. 50 of…
Murder—Non attestation of some of the documents by prosecution witness, at the spot is of no consequence. Murder–Evidence–Even if the dying declarations are disbelieved, yet the oral evidence of witness to the extent is admissible.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2417 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Criminal Appeal No. 116 of…
Causing disappearance of Evidence—The fact that the concealment was likely to have that effect is not sufficient, for Section 201 speaks of intention as distinct from a mere likelihood.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2412 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeP.P. Naolekar Criminal Appeal No. 407 of 2001…
Dying Declaration—Murder—Four Contradictory declarations—Accused acquitted on benefit of doubt.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2409 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeH.S. Bedi Criminal Appeal No. 130 of 2006…