Obscene Pictures—Appellant who has been discharged under Section 67 of the IT Act cannot be proceeded under Section 292 IPC.
2017(1) Law Herald (P&H) 643 (SC) : 2016 LawHerald.Org 2502 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipak Misra The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Praffula C. Pant…
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, S.166–Accident–Just Compensation- If overall award of compensation is just and fair, then, such award deserves to be upheld in claimants’ favour.
2017(1) Law Herald (P&H) 632 (SC) : 2017 LawHerald.Org 589 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre…
Custom–Karewa Marriage–In case of death of either of the sons or the co-widow, respective share in the property devolves upon the remaining widow, in proportion, by survivorship. Custom–Karewa Marriage–Daughter of the deceased, from earlier husband of the surviving widow, can not claim succession or inheritance or right of reversion in such property. Custom–Karewa Marriage–In matters of succession to deceased’s ancestral property, the widow under Karewa shall be preferred to the collaterals and daughter/s of that person. Custom–Where ‘Customary Law’ is not excluded by the Statutory Law, the former would prevail over the latter.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendaran Civil Appeal No. 12395 of 1996 [From the Final…
Acquisition of Land–Re-conveyance of land–Doctrine of public trust would disable the State from giving back the property for anything less than the market value. Acquisition of Land–Re-conveyance of land cannot be ordered merely because there is delay in implementation of scheme for which land was acquired.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2517 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.K. Thakker The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Balasubramaniyan Civil Appeal Nos. 5928-5929 of…
Whether the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 who purchased khairwood and processed the same and manufactured ‘katha’ are ‘producers’ within the meaning of the Himachal Pradesh Agricultural Produce Marketing Act
(1996) 7 AD 637 : (1996) 8 JT 321 : (1996) 6 SCALE 583 : (1997) 2 SCC 496 : (1996) 5 SCR 515 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA…
Efforts were made to arrest the detenu – Detention order sent to the office of the Commissioner with identification particulars including photographs – Successfully evaded arrest – No unusual delay in executing the order of detention.
AIR 2005 SC 428 : (2005) 98 ECC 1 : (2005) 11 JT 518 : (2004) 10 SCALE 375 : (2005) 10 SCC 97 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNION…
Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 275(1), 275(1)(a) -Period of limitation – Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income- Tax Appellate Tribunal failed to appreciate that the period of limitation in the instant case is governed by the provisions of Section 275(1) as the penalty was initiated in the assessment order itself and the penalty order was issued within time in accordance with the provisions of Section 275(1)(a) of the Income- Tax Act, 1961
(2013) 217 TAXMAN 400 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX — Appellant Vs. KEDIA POWER LTD. — Respondent ( Before : H.L. Dattu, J; Dipak Misra, J…
The seats having been moulded for use as parts of these motor vehicles, the entry that more specifically applied was Tariff Item 34-A – Appeal dismissed.
(1997) 91 ELT 265 : (1998) 8 SCC 370 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA M.M. RUBBER CO. LTD. — Appellant Vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS — Respondent ( Before…
Appellants are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and they are also ready to appear at the police station concerned for investigation – Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, court grant bail to the appellants,
(2004) 13 SCC 521 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PANDURANG BALIRAMJI KHARAD — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — Respondent ( Before : Shivaraj V. Patil, J; B.N. Srikrishna, J…
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 7, Rule 11 – Application for rejection of plaint, such application can be decided by the Court on the basis of averments made in the plaint and for that purpose, filing of written statements by the defendant will not be necessary for exercising such power under Order 7, Rule 11.
AIR 2003 SC 759 : (2003) 1 DMC 166 : (2002) 10 JT 558 : (2003) 1 SCC 557 : (2002) 5 SCR 491 Supp : (2003) 1 UJ…