Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code 1959 – Section 115 – Correction in revenue entries – There is a concurrent finding by the First Appellate Court and the High Court that the procedure not having been followed, the correction made in the revenue records and on basis of which the Temple was claimed to be a public temple and the Collector as the Manager thereof was unsustainable. – Appeal dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. MURTI SHRI CHATURBHUJNATH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Navin Sinha and Sanjiv Khanna,…
Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 2(35) – Applicant having failed to make out any credible or cogent ground for Recall of the judgment – Application dismissed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) – 1 — Appellant Vs. NRA IRON AND STEEL PVT. LTD. — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh…
“The aspect of sentencing should not be taken for granted, as this part of Criminal Justice System has determinative impact on the society. “
Tests To Be Applied While Sentencing In A Criminal Case; SC Explains [Read Judgment] BY: ASHOK KINI22 Oct 2019 7:01 PM “The aspect of sentencing should not be taken for…
Supreme Court On Tuesday granted bail to Chidambaram in the INX Media Case – Flight Risk Of Economic Offenders Cannot Be Looked At As A National Phenomenon To Deny Bail: SC
Flight Risk Of Economic Offenders Cannot Be Looked At As A National Phenomenon To Deny Bail: SC BY: LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK22 Oct 2019 12:51 PM “Flight risk” of economic offenders…
“We fail to understand as to how a dispute with regard to the inheritance under a will and deed of confirmation can be decided in a criminal proceeding. “
Disputed Property Claim Based On Inheritance Cannot Be Decided In A Criminal Proceeding: SC BY: LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK21 Oct 2019 7:49 PM “We fail to understand as to how a…
HC Cannot Modify Order Affirmed By SC Invoking Its Inherent Powers U/s 482 CrPC: SC ” …..does not enable the High Court to alter, add to, modify or vary any order that has been affirmed by the Supreme Court.””
HC Cannot Modify Order Affirmed By SC Invoking Its Inherent Powers U/s 482 CrPC: SC BY: LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK21 Oct 2019 8:43 PM “The inherent power of the High Court…
(Rape) Conviction Cannot Be Solely Based On Statements Made To Police U/s 154/161 CrPC
(Rape) Conviction Cannot Be Solely Based On Statements Made To Police U/s 154/161 CrPC: SC [Read Order] BY: LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK21 Oct 2019 4:45 PM “It is the statement made…
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 21 Rule 97, Order 21 Rule 99, Order 7 Rule 11, Order 21 Rule 25 and Order 21 Rule 35(3) – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 4 – Delivery of possession by police help to the decree holder cannot be granted and stands vitiated in absence of any orders by the Court for providing such police assistance. In peculiar circumstances delivery of land not interfered with
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH OM PARKASH AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. AMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Navin Sinha and B.R. Gavai, JJ. ) Civil…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 120-B 418, 420, 448 and 380 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Sections 156(3) and 482 – Forgery and fabricationWhere the uncontroverted allegations in the FIR and the evidence collected in support of the same do not disclose any offence and make out a case against the accused, the court would be justified in quashing the proceedings.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M. SRIKANTH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Navin Sinha and B.R. Gavai, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 – Sections 50, 51, 59, 55, 85 and 86 – Declaration of undisclosed foreign asset -The penal provisions under Sections 50 and 51 of the Black Money Act would come into play only when an assessee has failed to take benefit of Section 59 and neither disclosed assets covered by the Black Money Act nor paid the tax and penalty thereon. As such, we find that the High Court was not right in holding that, by the notification/order impugned before it, the penal provisions were made retrospectively applicable.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. GAUTAM KHAITAN — Respondent ( Before : Arun Mishra, M. R. Shah and B.R. Gavai, JJ.…