Tender – Installation and maintenance of 74 videoscopes at various field formations of CBEC – direct that out of the payment to be made to M/s. ASVA Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd., a sum of Rs. 63 lakhs shall be deducted and orders with regard to that amount shall be passed after hearing the parties in detail at the time of final hearing.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH COMMISSIONER, DIRECTORATE OF LOGISTICS — Appellant Vs. ALMIGHTY TECHSERV, PROPRIETOR MR. MANISH DALMIA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha…
Suits With Basic Relief Of Challenging Decree Passed By DRT Not Maintainable: SC HELD “Without exhausting the remedy of appeal provided under the RDDBFI Act, the suits with the basic relief of challenging the decree passed by the DRT were liable to be dismissed.”
Suits With Basic Relief Of Challenging Decree Passed By DRT Not Maintainable: SC [Read Judgment] Ashok Kini 28 Feb 2020 9:43 PM “Without exhausting the remedy of appeal provided under…
Judicial Officer’s Integrity Must Be Of A Higher Order And Even A Single Aberration Is Not Permitted: SC
Judicial Officer’s Integrity Must Be Of A Higher Order And Even A Single Aberration Is Not Permitted: SC [Read Judgment] Ashok Kini 27 Feb 2020 6:02 PM The Supreme Court…
IMP ::: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 5(8) and 43 – Mortgage by a Corporate debtor to secure debts of third party not “Financial Debt” within meaning of Section 5(8) – Whether lenders of Jaiprakash Associates Limited could be treated as financial creditors, HELD it cannot be said that the corporate debtor owes them any ‘financial debt’ within the meaning of Section 5(8) of the Code; and hence, such lenders of Jaiprakash Associates Limited do not fall in the category of the ‘financial creditors’ of the corporate debtor Jaypee Infratech Limited – Appeals are allowed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ANUJ JAIN INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR JAYPEE INFRATECH LIMITED — Appellant Vs. AXIS BANK LIMITED ETC. ETC. — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) Section 340 read with 195 – Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 – Production of forged documents before the Revenue Court – Larger bench to consider (i) Whether Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 mandates a preliminary inquiry and an opportunity of hearing to the would-be accused before a complaint is made under Section 195 of the Code by a Court? (ii) What is the scope and ambit of such preliminary inquiry?
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE STATE OF PUNJAB — Appellant Vs. JASBIR SINGH — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 – Section 28 – Deposit of amount – Word “deposit” used in the Section, is to be understood and mean that deposit is to be made either, before making an application, or simultaneously with the application within the prescribed time of thirty days
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NARAYAN YADAV (D) THR.LRS. — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and R. Subhash…
Goa, Daman and Diu Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 – Section 32 – Any transfer or transaction in respect of any evacuee property is not valid unless it is made with the previous approval of the Custodian
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SITABAI SHANTARAM TALAWNEKAR AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and R.…
Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960 – Regulations 39(1), 39(4)(i) and 39(4) – Penalty imposed on employee on the grounds of conduct which had led to a conviction on a criminal charge – Where the respondent was convicted of various criminal offences and subsequently, a notice to show cause was issued – HELD DB of high court was in error to hold the action on notice pending, decision of criminal appeal
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. MUKESH POONAMCHAND SHAH — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Hemant Gupta, JJ.…
Enforcement Directorate Has No Right To Impound Passport: SC HELD “Passport can only be impounded by the concerned Passport Authorities. “
Enforcement Directorate Has No Right To Impound Passport: SC [Read Order] Ashok Kini 24 Feb 2020 2:46 PM “Passport can only be impounded by the concerned Passport Authorities. “ The…
Rebuttal Of Presumption U/s 139 NI Act Can Only Be Done After Adducing Evidence: SC HELD “Rebuttal can be made with reference to the evidence of the prosecution as well as of defence.”
Rebuttal Of Presumption U/s 139 NI Act Can Only Be Done After Adducing Evidence: SC [Read Order] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 23 Feb 2020 12:34 PM “Rebuttal can be made with…