Reservation of appointments – HELD that if the required number of candidates belonging to the community which fall under reservation are not available, then, the vacancies, for which selection could not be made in the current year, should be treated as backlog vacancies.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. K. SHOBANA ETC. ETC. — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari…
A & C Act – S 2(1)(f) would show that whatever be the transaction between the parties, if it happens to be entered into between persons, at least one of whom is either a foreign national, or habitually resident in, any country other than India; or by a body corporate which is incorporated in any country other than India; or by the Government of a foreign country, the arbitration becomes an international commercial arbitration- This being the case, it is clear that the Delhi High Court had no jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED — Appellant Vs. RAVINDRANATH RAO SINDHIA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ.…
Reservation of seats in respect of OBCs – Reservation for OBCs must be proportionate in the context of nature and implications of backwardness and in any case, is permissible only to the extent it does not exceed the aggregate of 50 per cent of the total seats in the local bodies reserved for SCs/STs/OBCs taken together
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH VIKAS KISHANRAO GAWALI — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.…
(CrPC) – Section 311 – The significant expression that occurs is “at any stage of any inquiry or trial or other proceeding under this Code”. It is, however, to be borne in mind that the discretionary power conferred under Section 311 CrPC has to be exercised judiciously, as it is always said “wider the power, greater is the necessity of caution while exercise of judicious discretion.”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH V.N. PATIL — Appellant Vs. K. NIRANJAN KUMAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Nature of charges found against the respondent can hardly be one to call for a major penalty – There was no bribery charge – Anyone can make mistakes – Consequences of mistakes should not be unduly harsh – Compulsory retirement set-aside.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. P. BALASUBRAHMANAYAM — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) Civil…
Recruitment to public services – Where the recruitment to public employment stands vitiated as a consequence of systemic fraud or irregularities, the entire process becomes illegitimate.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SACHIN KUMAR AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD (DSSSB) AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud…
CPC – Compliance of proviso to Section 17 is a Precondition for maintainability of application under Order 9 Rule 13 – Application under Order 9 Rule 13 can be allowed only when sufficient cause is made out to set aside the ex parte decree
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SUBODH KUMAR — Appellant Vs. SHAMIM AHMED — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ. ) Civil Appeal Nos. 802-803…
If evidence on record clearly establishes that the deceased was murdered by the accused by using firearm, the factum of motive loses its importance, more so, in this case the motive has been established by leading cogent evidence to show that only because the deceased had developed relationship with accused’s wife, has decided to eliminate the deceased
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAHUL — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 262…
Dying declaration – Deceased has suffered 90 per cent injuries and was in a fit condition to make a declaration – Deceased was tortured by the accused and his family members – Merely because family members were in the hospital, the same is no ground to disbelieve the dying declaration – Conviction upheld.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SATPAL — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 261…
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34(3) – Period of limitation for filing objections would have to be reckoned from the date on which the signed copy of the award was made.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED — Appellant Vs. M/S NAVIGANT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi,…







