Service Law – Consequential benefits – appellants who are found to be eligible for promotion as per the existing rules and as directed by the learned Single Judge, would be extended all consequential benefits
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH KRISHNA RAI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari…
Abkari Act, 1077 – Section 55(a) – Conviction and Sentence – Modification of – – 23 years elapsed since incident – modify the sentence to simple imprisonment of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SUNIL KUMAR — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Abkari Act, 1077 – Section 55(g) – Conviction and Sentence – Modification of – appellant crossed 63 years of age, appropriate to modify the sentence to simple imprisonment of one year- matter and the fact that 15 years have been rolled by
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH GOPINATHAN — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF KERALA — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No(s). 906…
Double jeopardy – Article 20(2) – Section 300 Cr PC – – Accused having gone through the trial in relation to offences under Sections 504 and 506 IPC and having been acquitted, cannot be subjected to another trial for the same charges on the same facts
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MS. P[1] XXX — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Criminal…
Murder – Acquittal – Only circumstance of last seen will not complete the chain of circumstances to record the finding that it is consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused, and therefore no conviction on that basis alone can be founded – Appellant acquitted
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH CHANDRAPAL — Appellant Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (EARLIER M.P.) — Respondent ( Before : Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and Bela M. Trivedi, JJ. ) Criminal…
CIRP – Recovery Certificate Holder – Limitation period – the holder of such certificate would be entitled to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), if initiated within a period of three years from the date of issuance of the Recovery Certificate.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED — Appellant Vs. A. BALAKRISHNAN AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai and A.S. Bopanna,…
HELD perusal of the record would clearly reveal that an opportunity was given by the Appellate Authority to the Enquiry Committee to examine the important witnesses. Even on remand, the said three witnesses were not examined. Appeal dismissed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SURESH KUMAR SINGH — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Hima Kohli, JJ. ) Civil…
National Green Tribunal – Territorial jurisdiction of High Court – In any case, no law is necessary to state that insofar as the Tribunals are concerned, they would be subordinate to the High Court
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH — Appellant Vs. RAGHU RAMAKRISHNA RAJU KANUMURU (M.P.) — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Hima Kohli, JJ.…
Evidence of witness would fall in the category of “wholly unreliable” witness – As such, no conviction could be based solely on his testimony – Medical evidence could only establish that the death was homicidal – Only because motive is established, the conviction cannot be sustained – Appellants acquitted.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MAHENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF M.P. — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Hima Kohli, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Shree Jagannatha Temple – Development works – Construction is being carried out for the purpose of providing basic and essential amenities like toilets for men and women, cloak rooms, electricity rooms etc. – These are the basic facilities which are necessary for the convenience of the devotees at large
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH ARDHENDU KUMAR DAS — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Hima Kohli, JJ. )…