The Supreme Court held that the respondent, who sold his flat to a borrower financed by the appellant, was not a ‘consumer’ of the appellant under the Act, 1986, due to the absence of a direct contractual relationship
2025 INSC 371 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S CITICORP FINANCE (INDIA) LIMITED Vs. SNEHASIS NANDA ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…
A statutory board lacks the authority to unilaterally reverse a government land acquisition for a public purpose through a private agreement.
2025 INSC 367 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN Vs. BHAGWAN DEVI (DEAD), THROUGH HER LR. ( Before : Sanjiv Khanna, CJI and…
Supreme Court partly allows an appeal, converting a conviction under Section 302 to Section 304, considering the lack of premeditation and the time already served by the appellant
2025 INSC 378 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SUDAM PRABHAKAR ACHAT Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Augustine George Masih, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Supreme Court sets aside the High Court’s conviction of six individuals for rioting and related offences, restoring their acquittal, as their mere presence at the crime scene amidst a large crowd was insufficient to prove membership in an unlawful assembly without evidence of specific roles or overt acts.
2025 INSC 381 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DHIRUBHAI BHAILALBHAI CHAUHAN AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS ( Before : Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Manoj Misra, JJ.…
Supreme Court upholds the condonation of a 1537-day delay in the State’s second appeal, emphasizing a liberal approach when substantial justice is at stake
2025 INSC 382 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH INDER SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No…..of…
Limitation in consumer protection cases should be interpreted holistically, considering the continuing cause of action and prioritizing substantive rights over strict procedural time bars.
2025 INSC 294 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PUSHPA JAGANNATH SHETTY AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. SAHAJ ANKUR REALTORS AND OTHERS ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Manmohan, JJ. )…
A suit in representative capacity (Order 1, Rule 8 CPC) is not maintainable if lacking locus standi, and a prior decree (res judicata) bars subsequent suits on the same subject matter, notwithstanding varying reliefs.
2025 INSC 214 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S. B N PADMANABHAIAH AND SONS — Appellant Vs. R N NADIGAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : J.B. Pardiwala…
Agreement to sell immovable property incurs stamp duty as deemed conveyance via implied/symbolic possession transfer, with duty applying to the agreement (instrument), not the sale (transaction).
2025 INSC 213 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAMESH MISHRIMAL JAIN — Appellant Vs. AVINASH VISHWANATH PATNE AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan,…
The Supreme Court emphasized that the goal is to ensure just and fair compensation, even if it exceeds the claimed amount. It recalculated the compensation, considering the claimant’s monthly income, future prospects, 40% permanent disability, medical expenses, attendant charges, special diet and transportation, pain and suffering, and loss of income during treatment. The final compensation was determined to be Rs. 17,82,825, modifying the awards of the MACT and High Court. The Civil Appeal was allowed, with interest as awarded by the Tribunal. This decision underscores the principle of providing fair compensation to accident victims based on comprehensive assessment of their losses and suffering.
2025 INSC 165 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH HARE KRUSHNA MAHANTA Vs. HIMADARI SAHU AND ANOTHER ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
In child custody cases, the lawpoint is that the welfare of the minor child is the paramount consideration, and a Habeas Corpus writ petition is maintainable only when the child’s detention is proven illegal or without legal authority
2025 INSC 159 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH VIVEK KUMAR CHATURVEDI AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and…