![[Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, S. 80] | [Civil court jurisdiction barred for disputes concerning public trusts unless specific conditions are met.]](https://i0.wp.com/sclaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Code-of-Civil-Procedure.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Manipur case hearing — the well-settled principle is that counsel appearing before the Court are officers of the Court and are responsible only to the Court for their conduct.
PARA 7 The reference in the affidavit of the Chief Secretary to the counsel appearing before this Court shall not be construed as any comment on the conduct of the…
(CrPC) – Section 482 – Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 498A – Allegations are mostly general and omnibus in nature, without any specific details as to how and when her brothers-in-law and mother-in-law, who lived in different cities altogether, subjected her to harassment for dowry – FIR quashed – Appeal allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ABHISHEK — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : Aniruddha Bose, Sanjay Kumar and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Accused without first successfully assailing the order declaring him as a proclaimed offender, could not have proceeded to seek anticipatory bail.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF HARYANA — Appellant Vs. DHARAMRAJ — Respondent ( Before : Ahsanuddin Amanullah and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. of 2023;…
Request for recall of the appellant as a witness under Section 311, CrPC was justified, as at the relevant point of time in his initial deposition, there was no occasion for him to bring the relevant facts relating to similarity of data before the Court, which arose after the CFSL expert was examined.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SATBIR SINGH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ahsanuddin Amanullah and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
HELD any promotion given to the petitioner consequent to his continuance in service on the strength of the interim order would automatically fall to the ground once the Special Leave Petition is dismissed and the termination order attains finality.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH JAGPAL SINGH — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal, JJ. )…
Even in a case where the final report of the police under Section 173 is accepted and the accused persons are discharged, the Magistrate has the power to take cognizance of the offence on a complaint or a Protest Petition on the same or similar allegations even after the acceptance of the final report – Magistrate is not debarred from taking cognizance of a complaint merely on the ground that earlier he had declined to take cognizance of the police report
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ZUNAID — Appellant Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Bela M. Trivedi and Dipankar Datta, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Murder – Advocate appointed to represent accused was not granted even a reasonable time to prepare herself – Therefore, the impugned judgment insofar as relates to the appeal preferred by the appellant is concerned will have to be set aside and the appeal will have to be remanded to the High Court
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NIRANJAN DAS @ NIRU DAS @ MAHANTO — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S.Oka and Pankaj…
Appellant continues to work as a lecturer in English on a half time basis – Therefore, for doing substantial justice, this is a fit case to invoke power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India for continuing her appointment on full time basis – Direction issued to State Government to release grant-in aid for paying salary.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH VIJAYA BHIKU KADAM — Appellant Vs. MAYANI BHAG SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol,…
Hindu Succession Act 1956 – Essential ingredient of Section 14 subsection (1) is possession over the property – Possession being a prerequisite to sustain a claim under subsection (1) of Section 14 of the 1956 Act – Admittedly the plaintiff was never in possession of the property – Appeal dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M. SIVADASAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. A. SOUDAMINI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : C.T. Ravikumar…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Section 432 – Remission of sentence – Overemphasis on the presiding judge’s opinion and complete disregard of comments of other authorities, while arriving at its conclusion, would render the appropriate government’s decision on a remission application, unsustainable
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAJO @ RAJWA @ RAJENDRA MANDAL — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : S. Ravindra Bhat and…