“Family Feud Over Property: Kamla Nagar Goes to One Side, Malcha Marg to the Other” – The court analyzed the Registration Act’s requirements for documenting transfers of property rights and concluded that the lack of registration indicated no settlement existed – The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s judgment regarding the Kamla Nagar property, restoring the Trial Court’s decision and confirming the appellants’ sole ownership – The decision regarding the Malcha Marg property was upheld, leaving it exclusively to the respondents.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH JUGAL KISHORE KHANNA(D) THR LRS AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. SUDHIR KHANNA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah,…
Property Dispute – The case involves disputes over property ownership after the original owner, ‘S’, passed away in 1947 – The Court found no foundation for the plea of adverse possession in the plaintiff’s claim, as the necessary facts were not adequately pleaded or proved – The appeals were dismissed, with the Court upholding the original decrees and granting the appellant time until March 31, 2025, to vacate the property, subject to certain conditions.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M. RADHESHYAMLAL — Appellant Vs. V SANDHYA AND ANOTHER ETC. — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ. ) Civil…
“Supreme Court Denies Bail to Ex-Delhi Minister Satyendar Kumar Jain in Money Laundering Case: PMLA’s Stringent Bail Conditions Upheld”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SATYENDAR KUMAR JAIN AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT — Respondent ( Before : Bela M. Trivedi and Pankaj Mithal, JJ. )…
Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 354D, 376(2)(n), 504 and 506 read with 34 – Supreme Court found inconsistencies in the appellant’s statements and lack of evidence for the alleged forced abortion at Nursing Home – The Court referenced previous judgments to establish that consent vitiated by a false promise of marriage does not constitute rape under Section 375 of IPC unless the promise was proven to be false at inception – The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the High Court that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the legal process and result in miscarriage of justice.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH MS. X — Appellant Vs. MR. A AND OTHERS ( Before : B.R. Gavai, Rajesh Bindal and Sandeep Mehta, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No……of…
“Supreme Court Rejects “Technicality”: Adani Power Loses Bid for Additional Payment from Rajasthan Discoms”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. ADANI POWER RAJASTHAN LTD. AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Aniruddha Bose and…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 109, 302 and 307 – Murder – Appeal against conviction – Court found inconsistencies in testimonies, lack of independent witnesses, and lapses in the police investigation – The Court discussed the right of private defense and the standards for “interested” versus “independent” witnesses – This Court allowed the appeals, set aside the convictions, and directed the release of both appellants, citing reasonable doubt in the prosecution’s case.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PERIYASAMY — Appellant Vs. THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — Respondent ( Before : Hrishikesh Roy and Sanjay Karol, JJ. )…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 302 and IPC – Murder – Conviction and Sentence – Modification of Sentence – Court meticulously examined the circumstantial evidence, confirming the appellant’s guilt and finding no plausible explanation for the events from the appellant – The Court discussed the principles of circumstantial evidence, emphasizing the need for a complete chain of evidence pointing to the appellant’s guilt – The Court upheld the conviction for murder, house-trespass, and attempted suicide, maintaining the modified sentence of life imprisonment for 30 years without remission
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH NAVAS @ MULANAVAS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KERALA — Respondent ( Before : B. R. Gavai, K.V. Viswanathan and Sandeep Mehta, JJ. )…
“Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT Decision on Valuation of Camera Stabilizer Imports: Review Order Timely Despite Pandemic Delay, Goods Deemed Comparable to Prior Imports”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES AND RESEARCH — Appellant Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI (IMPORT) — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and…
“Negotiable Instruments Act: Court Clarifies Discretion in Awarding Interim Compensation for Cheque Dishonor (Section 143A) – Merits of the Case Must Be Considered”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAKESH RANJAN SHRIVASTAVA — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.…
“Director’s Liability for Bounced Cheques: Supreme Court Acquits Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Operations or Cheque Signing”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SUSELA PADMAVATHY AMMA — Appellant Vs. M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…








