Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Section 48(1) — Refund of stamp duty — The appellants sought a refund of stamp duty paid for a property transaction that was later cancelled — The High Court dismissed their claim, holding that the amended six-month limitation period applied — The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the unamended two-year limitation period applied, and the appellants were entitled to a refund.
2025 INSC 104 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH HARSHIT HARISH JAIN AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Vikram Nath, Sanjay…
Civil Dispute vs. Criminal Offence — The court emphasized that the dispute was essentially civil in nature (related to employment termination) and that initiating criminal proceedings was an abuse of the legal process. – Civil Dispute vs. Criminal Offence — The court emphasized that the dispute was essentially civil in nature (related to employment termination) and that initiating criminal proceedings was an abuse of the legal process.
2025 INSC 105 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MADHUSHREE DATTA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dipankar Datta and Prashant…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 498A — Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 4 — The appellant was convicted for harassing his wife for dowry — The High Court modified the sentence from three years to two years imprisonment — The Supreme Court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone (approximately 3 months) and directed the appellant to pay Rs. 3,00,000 as compensation to the wife.
2025 INSC 106 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M. VENKATESWARAN — Appellant Vs. STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — Respondent ( Before : K.V. Viswanathan and S.V.…
High Court cannot pass an interim order in a second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC without first formulating a substantial question of law
2025 INSC 80 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH U. SUDHEERA AND OTHERS Vs. C. YASHODA AND OTHERS ( Before : J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
When a higher court’s decree is issued, the lower court’s decree merges into it, and any time stipulations in the lower court’s decree do not automatically revive upon the higher court’s judgment
2025 INSC 81 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH BALBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. BALDEV SINGH (D) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS ( Before : J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan,…
Promotions based on merit-cum-seniority, suitability should be judged individually, not comparatively, and officers meeting the minimum criteria cannot be denied promotion based on a merit list
2025 INSC 72 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before :…
A micro or small enterprise does not need to be registered under Section 8 of the MSMED Act to make a reference to the Facilitation Council for dispute resolution under Section 18
2025 INSC 54 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NBCC (INDIA) LTD. Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS ( Before : Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Pankaj Mithal, JJ.…
A decree for restitution of conjugal rights does not automatically disqualify a wife from receiving maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., and the court must assess whether the wife had sufficient reason to refuse to live with her husband despite the decree
2025 INSC 55 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RINA KUMARI @ RINA DEVI @ REENA Vs. DINESH KUMAR MAHTO @ DINESH KUMAR MAHATO AND ANOTHER ( Before : Sanjiv…
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 309 — Executive Orders as Recruitment Rules — The court affirms that in the absence of formal rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution, executive orders issued by the government can serve as the governing recruitment rules — Specifically, Government Order (G.O.) dated 07th April, 2008 is recognized as the applicable executive order for the Medical Education Service.
2025 INSC 70 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DR. SHARMAD Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS ( Before : Dipankar Datta and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies to the 3-month limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (ACA), but not to the 30-day condonable period, and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act (GCA) does not apply to Section 34(3) of the ACA.
2025 INSC 56 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH MY PREFERRED TRANSFORMATION & HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. M/S FARIDABAD IMPLEMENTS PVT. LTD. — Respondent ( Before…









