Informing an arrested person of the grounds for their arrest is a mandatory constitutional requirement under Article 22(1)
2025 INSC 162 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH VIHAAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ( Before : Abhay S. Oka, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
The judgment emphasizes that the accused’s intention to aid, instigate, or abet the deceased to commit suicide is essential for Section 306 IPC to apply — Furthermore, the alleged harassment should be so severe that the victim has no option but to end their life, and there must be evidence of direct or indirect incitement to commit suicide.
2025 INSC 168 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH AYYUB AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER ( Before : Sanjiv Khanna, CJI., Sanjay Kumar and K.V. Viswanathan,…
The Supreme Court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, citing inconsistencies in recovery witness testimonies, discrepancies in the recovery process, and lack of corroboration for the “last seen” testimony — The Court emphasized that recovery memos prepared at the police station lacked sanctity — Granting the benefit of the doubt, the Court acquitted the Appellant, set aside the convictions, and ordered his release.
2025 INSC 167 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAJA KHAN Vs. STATE OF CHATTISGARH ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Manmohan, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2025…
When determining compensation for an accident claim, notifications under the Minimum Wages Act can be a guiding factor in cases where there is no evidence available to evaluate monthly income
2025 INSC 166 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH JITENDRA Vs. SADIYA AND OTHERS ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 2209 of…
The complainant contended that the basis of valuation as mentioned in clause-4.3 of the policy was “All exports-CIF + 10%”. This meant that the complainant had an insurable interest in the consignments until they were delivered to the buyer – The insurer argued that the basis of valuation was “FOB” and that the insurance coverage terminated on delivery of the consignment to the port of New York – The NCDRC rejected the review application, holding that the complainant had not proved that the basis of valuation was “All exports-CIF + 10%” – The NCDRC also held that the NCDRC had not erred in holding that the insurance coverage terminated on delivery of the consignment to the warehouse.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION RENAISSANCE RTW (ASIA) (P) LTD. Vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ( Before : Ram Surat Ram Maurya, Presiding Member and Bharatkumar Pandya,…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 307 — Attempt to Murder — The complainant was abused and beaten by the accused, leading to an FIR under various IPC sections —Whether the injuries sustained by the complainant justify framing charges under Section 307 IPC — Petitioner argues that the injuries and the act of throttling indicate an intention to kill, warranting charges under Section 307 IPC — Respondent states that the injuries were minor, and the medical report did not conclusively support the charge of attempt to murder —The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s order, directing the trial court to frame charges under Section 307 IPC —The intent to kill can be inferred from the circumstances and the doctor’s report suggesting the possibility of throttling —The extent of injuries is irrelevant if the intent to cause death is present, as per established legal precedents —The trial court must proceed with charges under Section 307 IPC, and the trial should be expedited.
2024 INSC 731 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SHOYEB RAJA — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : C.T. Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol,…
The polluter is absolutely and continuously liable for environmental damage until the damage is reversed, and the government must enforce environmental laws, ensure compensation, and implement restoration measures.
2025 INSC 131 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH VELLORE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT MONITORING COMMITTEE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MR. R. RAJEBDRAN Vs. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VELLORE DISTRICT AND OTHERS (…
Employers cannot terminate workers during industrial disputes without permission, and workers performing equal duties are entitled to equal pay and potential regularization.
2025 INSC 144 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SHRIPAL AND ANOTHER Vs. NAGAR NIGAM, GHAZIABAD ( Before : Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…
Offence under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC-ST Act to be made out, the act of insult or intimidation must occur in a place “within public view,” and if the incident occurs in a private space without public witnesses, it does not satisfy the requirements of the Act. Consequently, the court can quash the proceedings if the allegations do not prima facie constitute an offence under the SC-ST Act.
2025 INSC 132 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH KARUPPUDAYAR Vs. STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LALGUDI TRICHY AND OTHERS ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Augustine…
Conviction under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must prove that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with a dowry demand soon before her death, and in the absence of such proof, the accused must be acquitted
2025 INSC 133 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH KARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 1076…









