Power to Summon material witness—Object of—That there may not be failure of justice on account of mistake of either party in bringing the valuable evidence on record or leaving ambiguity in the statements of the witnesses examined from either side.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2305 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 934 of…
Probation–Murder–There cannot be any bar for making an application–Acceptance or not is another question.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2302 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.P. Naolekar Criminal Appeal No. 913 of…
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, S.12–Housing–Delay in Possession-Escalation in cost of construction-Delay of six years in handing over physical possession-Further delay of 6 years by allottee in starting construction-Award of interest would have been sufficient to compensate the allotee
2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 125 : 2016 LawHerald.org 2442 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Chief Justice T.S. Thakur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud…
Murder–Appeal against acquittal–Doubtful prosecution witness–Acquittal upheld.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2297 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.P. Naolekar Criminal Appeal No. 364 of…
Murder—Appeal against acquittal—Doubtful prosecution witness–Presence of witness disputed—Appeal dismissed.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2295 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.P. Naolekar Criminal Appeal No. 284 of…
Reference of wrong provision of law— If an authority has a power under the law merely because while exercising that power the source of power is not specifically referred to or a reference is made to a wrong provision of law, that by itself does not vitiate the exercise of power so long as the power does exist and can be traced to a source available in law.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2289 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.P. Naolekar Civil Appeal No. 2951 of…
“Judge bashing” and using derogatory and contemptuous language against Judge–Contemnor deserves no sympathy.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2280 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Civil Appeal No. 7948 of…
Deficiency in Service–Acquired land allotted could not possessed due to litigation pending with the meanwhile landowner–Compensation awarded.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2277 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Balasubramaniyan The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K.…
Urban Land–State has not taken possession of surplus land–Proceeding came to be abated under Repeal Act.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2276 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Civil Appeal No. 632…
Inherent jurisdiction—It is neither possible nor desirable to lay down any inflexible rule which would govern the exercise of inherent jurisdiction. Charges have been framed, therefore question of quashing of FIR does not arise.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2272 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Criminal Appeal…