Appointment – Acquisition of land – Persons affected as a result of acquisition are not entitled to preferential treatment for employment in the Company.
(1995) 3 JT 428 : (1995) 2 SCALE 539 : (1995) 2 SCC 225 Supp : (1995) 3 SCR 76 : (1995) 2 UJ 129 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA…
Agreement of re-conveyance – – The father of the respondent had obtained the sale deed in the name of the minor, obviously he is bound by the agreement of re conveyance as well. Having received the money, he had not executed the sale deed – The subsequent purchaser is bound by this decree of specific performance and liable to re-convey
(1996) 9 AD 406 : (1996) 8 SCALE 687 : (1997) 1 SCC 475 : (1996) 8 SCR 720 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NIVARTI GOVIND INGALE AND OTHERS…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 300 – Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 9, 45 – Murder – Identification of dead body – Finger prints of deceased taken through spoon method – Receipt produced by prosecution bearing thumb impression of deceased, not proved – Comparison of finger prints of deceased with that of thumb impression – Would be of no consequence
AIR 2007 SC 1028 : (2007) CLT 847 Supp : (2006) 12 SCALE 470 : (2006) 9 SCR 733 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SADASHIO MUNDAJI BHALERAO — Appellant…
Having regard to the fact that the petitioner-wife is presently residing in Vadodara (Gujarat), Court is satisfied that greater hardship shall be caused to her in case the proceedings in the matrimonial case are allowed to be continued at Ambala Cantt (Haryana) — Petition stands allowed
(2014) 2 DMC 69 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NIDHI SURVE — Appellant Vs. SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH — Respondent ( Before : Shiva Kirti Singh, J; R.M. Lodha, J )…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Section 465(2) – Sanction for prosecution – Irregularity in – Effect of – Irregularity in sanction would not by itself render the trial vitiated. Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act-Section 3(4) – Harbour – Meaning of – Must be understood in its ordinary meaning as for penal provision – Mens rea is not excluded from constituting harbouring.
AIR 1998 SC 201 : (1998) CriLJ 369 : (1997) 9 JT 18 : (1997) 6 SCALE 689 : (1997) 8 SCC 732 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA KALPNATH RAI…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Sections 437(5) and 439(2)-Bail – Prayer for cancellation – No contravention of conditions of bail – Bail granted in the year 2004 – Now, order for cancellation of bail cannot be passed.
(2009) CriLJ 4421 : (2009) 13 JT 464 : (2009) 8 SCC 727 : (2009) 11 SCR 748 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M.M. COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. — Appellant…
The State Government is directed to consider and determine the restructure of the electrical and civil engineering departments and the required number of posts in each department and the qualifications prescribed and principles for filling up all the posts –
(1995) 8 JT 278 : (1995) 6 SCALE 397 : (1996) 7 SCC 35 : (1995) 4 SCR 731 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF MANIPUR — Appellant Vs.…
The criminal charge and the charge in the departmental enquiry were entirely different. The appellate court in the criminal case came to the conclusion that since the two ladies had not supported the prosecution case, the charges against the appellant were not proved – It is a settled proposition of law that strict rules of evidence are not applicable to departmental enquiries.
(1998) 8 SCC 723 : (1999) SCC(L&S) 257 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF T.N. — Appellant Vs. M.A. WAHEED KHAN — Respondent ( Before : Kuldip Singh, J;…
Arbitration agreement—Interim measure by tribunal–It is not possible to keep out the concept of balance of convenience, prima facie case, irreparable injury and the concept of just and convenient while passing interim measures under Section 9 of the Act.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2245 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.K. Sema The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan Civil Appeal No. 6569 of 2005…
Right to equality–In illegal order–Any direction for enforcement of such claim shall tantamount to perpetuating an illegality, which cannot be permitted.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2239 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Civil Appeal No. 2913 of…