Skip to content
  • June 17, 2025 11:54 am
Supreme Court of India  Judgements

Supreme Court of India Judgements

46800 Judgements hosted as on 11/06/2025 - Search (FREE), Subscribe, Read & Download

  • Home
  • TELEGRAM SEARCH BOT
  • Facebook
  • Pricing
  • Login
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Refund
Top Tags
  • Land acquisition police assistance
  • service matters
  • state laws
  • acquittal

Latest Post

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries. Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery. High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial. For Section 387 IPC, putting someone in fear of death/grievous hurt to commit extortion is sufficient; delivery of property is not required.
Consumer

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation

Jun 12, 2025 sclaw
Constitution

Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.

Jun 11, 2025 sclaw
Consumer

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation

Jun 12, 2025 sclaw
Constitution

Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.

Jun 11, 2025 sclaw
C P C Railways Act

Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
Cr P C

High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
I P C

For Section 387 IPC, putting someone in fear of death/grievous hurt to commit extortion is sufficient; delivery of property is not required.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Trending
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Consumer
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Constitution
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
C P C Railways Act
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.
Cr P C
High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.
Army Rules, 1954 – Rule 13(3)(III)(v) – Discharge from service – Offences for which the red ink entries are awarded, cannot be said to be such gross mis­conduct which would make the appellant indiscipline and liable to be discharged from service and that too, after a period of long service rendered by him – Order of discharge is wholly unjustified and not sustainable at law – Appeal allowed.
Service
Army Rules, 1954 – Rule 13(3)(III)(v) – Discharge from service – Offences for which the red ink entries are awarded, cannot be said to be such gross mis­conduct which would make the appellant indiscipline and liable to be discharged from service and that too, after a period of long service rendered by him – Order of discharge is wholly unjustified and not sustainable at law – Appeal allowed.
(IPC) – Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent -‘criminal breach of trust’ is defined under Section 405 IPC which provides, inter alia, that whoever being in any manner entrusted with property or with any dominion over a property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property contrary to law, or in violation of any law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or contravenes any legal contract, express or implied, etc. shall be held to have committed criminal breach of trust
Acquittal
(IPC) – Section 409 – Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent -‘criminal breach of trust’ is defined under Section 405 IPC which provides, inter alia, that whoever being in any manner entrusted with property or with any dominion over a property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property contrary to law, or in violation of any law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or contravenes any legal contract, express or implied, etc. shall be held to have committed criminal breach of trust
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(d)(ii) – Deficiency in service – Any loss arising out of inaction and negligence on the part of the Bank, such deficiency is compensable under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(d)(ii) – Deficiency in service – Any loss arising out of inaction and negligence on the part of the Bank, such deficiency is compensable under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Termination–Reservation–In advertisement, authorities failed to mention in regard to reservation for handicapped person at the outset–Appellants who were handicapped person were appointed–On Contempt petition State cancelled the selection and terminated the service–Service restored with backwages.
Service
Termination–Reservation–In advertisement, authorities failed to mention in regard to reservation for handicapped person at the outset–Appellants who were handicapped person were appointed–On Contempt petition State cancelled the selection and terminated the service–Service restored with backwages.
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Consumer
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Constitution
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
C P C Railways Act
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.
Cr P C
High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.
Service Matters
Service

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 136 – Transfer of case – Application for transfer of a pending case from one Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal to other

May 18, 2017 sclaw

  (2000) 10 JT 287 : (2001) 10 SCC 753 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA J.L. JAIN — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before :…

Service Matters
Service

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 136 – Pensions-Respondent absorbed in Indian Railways in 1957 – He had given voluntary option in 1958 for having Provident Fund

May 18, 2017 sclaw

  (2001) 90 FLR 497 : (2000) 8 JT 77 : (2000) 2 LLJ 1603 : (2001) 10 SCC 757 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND OTHERS…

I P C

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 302 – Murder – Appeal against acquittal – Reappreciation of evidence – Paramount consideration to prevent miscarriage of justice – Where admissible evidence is ignored, duty cast upon appellate Court to reappreciate evidence

May 18, 2017 sclaw

  AIR 2006 SC 2667 : (2006) CriLJ 3634 : (2006) 6 JT 163 : (2006) 6 SCALE 553 : (2006) 10 SCC 617 : (2006) 3 SCR 314 Supp…

Acquittal

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 302, 34 and 201 – Murder of woman by her in-laws – Occurrence preceded by complaints of harassment perpetrated by accused-appellants – Conviction based on circumstantial evidence

May 18, 2017 sclaw

  AIR 2009 SC 655 : (2008) 11 JT 423 : (2008) 13 SCALE 672 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SMT. MULA DEVI AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND…

Acquittal

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section – 354, 498-A, 376, 511 – Sexual abuse of girl –

May 18, 2017 sclaw

(1996) 3 Crimes 85 : (1996) 7 JT 6 : (1996) 5 SCALE 523 : (1996) 9 SCC 766 : (1996) 4 SCR 197 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION…

Service Matters
Service

Appointment to the post of a Teacher

May 18, 2017 sclaw

(1998) 9 JT 130 : (1998) 9 SCC 57 : (1998) SCC(L&S) 1111 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SITA RAM SAINI — Appellant Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER…

Constitution

There should be no bar to the lodgment of an appeal or petition either by the Union of India or the Public Sector Undertakings before any court or tribunal so as to save limitation. But, before such filing every endeavor should be made to have the clearance of the High Power Committee

May 18, 2017 sclaw

  (1994) 70 ELT 45 : (2011) 2 SCALE 498 : (2004) 6 SCC 437 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION — Appellant Vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL…

I P C

Rape—Quashing of Summoning Order—Despite categoric statement of prosecutrix u/s 164 CrPC summoning order quashed on basis of material collected during investigation.

May 17, 2017 sclaw

2017(2) Law Herald (P&H) 949 (SC) : 2017 LawHerald.Org 817 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. K. Sikri The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan…

Acquittal

Criminal Jurisprudence—Proof beyond reasonable doubt is a guideline, not a obsession. FIR—Prompt lodging—Acquittal—Fact that the FIR was lodged very soon therefore there was no time to concoct a false story—Not always acceptable.

May 17, 2017 sclaw

2017(2) Law Herald (P&H) 941 (SC) : 2017 LawHerald.Org 816 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.F. Nariman…

Matrimonial

Maintenance—Merely because wife is capable of earning is not, sufficient reason to reduce the maintenance awarded by the family court.

May 17, 2017 sclaw

  2017(2) Law Herald (P&H) 940 (SC) : 2017 LawHerald.Org 814 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prafulla…

Posts pagination

1 … 644 645 646 … 715
Login Status
Forgot?  Register
Categories
Archives
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

You missed

Consumer

Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation

Jun 12, 2025 sclaw
Constitution

Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.

Jun 11, 2025 sclaw
C P C Railways Act

Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
Cr P C

High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.

Jun 10, 2025 sclaw
Supreme Court of India  Judgements

Supreme Court of India Judgements

46800 Judgements hosted as on 11/06/2025 - Search (FREE), Subscribe, Read & Download