Where an advertisement was issued subsequent to the notification of the 2020 Rules providing 33% horizontal reservation for women, and specified certain posts (like DSP ‘SC Sports’) as reserved for women (‘SC Sports (Women)’), this reservation specification within the advertisement, implementing the mandate of the 2020 Rules, is valid for that recruitment process, unless the advertisement itself is successfully challenged or withdrawn.
2025 INSC 479 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PRABHJOT KAUR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
For an offence under Section 3(1)(r) (intentional insult/intimidation) or Section 3(1)(s) (abuse by caste name) of the SC/ST Act, the act must occur “within public view”
2025 INSC 459 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH HUTU ANSARI @ FUTU ANSAR AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran,…
Preliminary enquiry is not mandatory for registering a disproportionate assets FIR under the PC Act if the Superintendent of Police’s order under S.17 relies on sufficient material (like a source report) demonstrating application of mind.
2025 INSC 471 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. SRI CHANNAKESHAVA.H.D. AND ANOTHER ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
The interpretation of a written agreement to determine if it grants a ‘leave and license’ (potentially attracting deemed tenancy under S.15A Bombay Rent Act) or merely permits ‘conducting a business’ depends primarily on its written terms construed under Ss. 91/92 Evidence Act, excluding contradictory oral evidence.
2025 INSC 466 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ANNAYA KOCHA SHETTY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS Vs. LAXMIBAI NARAYAN SATOSE SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS ( Before : Pankaj Mithal…
Eligibility for dynamic reservation categories (OBC-NCL/EWS etc.) requires possessing a category certificate valid under applicable rules (including period/affidavits) as of the recruitment’s cut-off date (last application date if unspecified).
2025 INSC 463 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SAKSHI ARHA Vs. THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AND OTHERS ( Before : Abhay S. Oka, Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Augustine George Masih,…
Absence of the mandatory Rule 9 (CMVR) hazardous goods endorsement on a driver’s licence constitutes a fundamental policy breach, permitting insurer pay-and-recover, especially when negligent driving causes the accident.
2025 INSC 468 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S. CHATHA SERVICE STATION Vs. LALMATI DEVI AND OTHERS ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. ) Civil…
Quashing criminal proceedings under S.482 CrPC is improper when prima facie material, including corroborated statements of the accused/co-accused and surrounding circumstances, indicates involvement warranting trial.
025 INSC 474 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH HYEOKSOO SON AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR DAECHANG SEAT AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD. Vs. MOON JUNE SEOK AND ANOTHER ( Before : Sanjay Karol…
Financial assistance equivalent to ‘pay/allowances’ under Haryana Compassionate Assistance Rules must be deducted from MV Act compensation for loss of income to prevent double recovery.
2025 INSC 469 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SMT. SUNITA SHARMA AND OTHERS ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ.…
An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a private employment contract, designating a competent court, is valid and enforceable, ousting jurisdiction of other courts, despite potential unequal bargaining power.
025 INSC 473 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAKESH KUMAR VERMA Vs. HDFC BANK LTD. ( Before : Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 2282 of…
An Additional Collector empowered under the M.P. Land Revenue Code can validly permit tribal land transfer under S.165(6)(ii) (outside notified areas) after due consideration, rendering subsequent suo motu revision setting aside such permission erroneous.
2025 INSC 470 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. DINESH KUMAR AND OTHERS ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. )…








