No Estoppel against law, erroneous concession in law by advocate does not bind client.
No Estoppel against law, erroneous concession in law by advocate does not bind client: Supreme Court Murali Krishnan September 27 2019 There can be no estoppel against law. Therefore, an erroneous concession on law made…
Title can be claimed through Adverse Possession
Title can be claimed through Adverse Possession; 70-year-old land dispute comes to an end in Supreme Court Shruti Mahajan September 27 2019 A dispute which started before the Supreme Court came into existence, finally came…
Date Of Default Alone Is Relevant For Triggering Limitation For Winding Up Petition: SC Dismisses IL& F S Petition Against La-Fin – Art 137 Limitation applies to such disputes
Date Of Default Alone Is Relevant For Triggering Limitation For Winding Up Petition: SC Dismisses IL& F S Petition Against La-Fin – Art 137 Limitation applies to such disputes IN…
NGOs substantially funded by government are subject to RTI Act, rules Supreme Court
NGOs substantially funded by government are subject to RTI Act, rules Supreme Court Murali Krishnan September 17 2019 FacebookTwitterWhatsAppShare69 Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) substantially funded by the government are subject to Right to Information Act,…
NDPS Act- Court Should Be Satisfied That Confession Is Voluntary And Accused Was Apprised Of His Rights: SC
NDPS Act- Court Should Be Satisfied That Confession Is Voluntary And Accused Was Apprised Of His Rights: SC REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCRIMINAL APPEAL NO.296 OF 2014…
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 2(1)(f), 2(1)(g) and 2(1)(o) – Validity of imposition of “composition fee” and “extension fee” – This Court hold that the determination of the dispute concerning the validity of the imposition of a statutory due arising out of a “deficiency in service”, can be undertaken by the consumer fora as per the provisions of the Act – HUDA vs. Sunita, (2005) 2 SCC 479, overruled.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOW GLADA) — Appellant Vs. VIDYA CHETAL AND RAM SINGH — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, Mohan…
Ancestral Property—Karta of HUF executed sale deed of Co-parcenary Property in favour his second wife without any sale consideration—Such sale of HUF property was not for legal necessity or benefit to the estate-Sale deed executed by karta and further sale by his second wife to subsequent purchasers held to be null and void
2019(3) Law Herald (SC) 2054 : 2019 LawHerald.Org 1257 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Indu Malhotra Civil Appeal No.…
Appeal against Acquittal—Leave to Appeal—Appeal filed by victim not to be dismissed at threshold only because no leave has been granted to the State to appeal against the order of acquittal
2019(3) Law Herald (SC) 2052 : 2019 LawHerald.Org 1256 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph Criminal Appeal No.…
Execution of Decree—Consent Order—Order passed on basis of compromise between the parties itself does not amount to a decree—It is necessary for the Court to pass a decree
2019(3) Law Herald (SC) 2041 : 2019 LawHerald.Org 1255 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari Civil Appeal No.…
Summary Suit—Leave to Defend—Mere fact that there may have been commercial relationship between the parties could not per se be the justification for grant of conditional leave without proper consideration of the defence from the materials on record
2019(3) Law Herald (SC) 2036 : 2019 LawHerald.Org 1254 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha Civil Appeal No(s). 5528…