PNB Scam – Powers Under Sec 339 Companies Act Can Be Invoked Only Against Officers Of Company In Which Mismanagement Is Alleged : SC
PNB Scam – Powers Under Sec 339 Companies Act Can Be Invoked Only Against Officers Of Company In Which Mismanagement Is Alleged : SC [Read Order] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 20…
SC Upholds Introduction Of NEET To AYUSH Under Graduate CoursesHELD”Lack of minimum standards of education would result in half-baked doctors being turned out of professional colleges.”
SC Upholds Introduction Of NEET To AYUSH Under Graduate Courses [Read Judgment] Ashok Kini 20 Feb 2020 7:02 PM “Lack of minimum standards of education would result in half-baked doctors…
Marriage Contracted During Pendency Of Appeal From A Divorce Decree Filed After Expiry Of Limitation Period Is Not Void: SC
Marriage Contracted During Pendency Of Appeal From A Divorce Decree Filed After Expiry Of Limitation Period Is Not Void: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 20 Feb 2020 6:17 PM…
[Meghalaya] District Council Court Can Try Criminal Cases In Which Both Victim & Accused Belong To Scheduled Tribe: SC
[Meghalaya] District Council Court Can Try Criminal Cases In Which Both Victim & Accused Belong To Scheduled Tribe: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 19 Feb 2020 12:17 PM The…
Practising Advocates’ Experience Gained At Bar Injects Judicial Branch With Fresh Perspectives : SC
Practising Advocates’ Experience Gained At Bar Injects Judicial Branch With Fresh Perspectives : SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 19 Feb 2020 8:34 PM Members of bar can add to…
“….no compulsion for the plaintiff to, at the stage of filing the suit, prove or establish the claim that the suit lands were revenue paying and the details of such revenue paid. Once it is conceded that the value of the land [per explanation to Section 7 (iv-A)] is to be determined according to either sub clauses (v), (va) or (vb) of the Act, this meant that the concept of “market value” – a wider concept in other contexts, was deemed to be referrable to one or other modes of determining the value under sub clauses (v), (va) or (vb) of Section 7 (iv-A)…”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH AGRA DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION — Appellant Vs. ANIL DAVID AND OTHER — Respondent ( Before : Arun Mishra, M. R. Shah and S. Ravindra…
Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 – Sections 3, 6(19), 34 and 108 – Specific endowment – Deed of Settlement does create a “specific endowment” HELD In view of Section 108, no suit or legal proceedings in respect of the administration or management of a religious institution or any other matter for determining or deciding which provision is made in the Act shall be instituted in a civil court
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE IDOL OF SRI RENGANATHASWAMY REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JOINT COMMISSIONER — Appellant Vs. P K THOPPULAN CHETTIAR, RAMANUJA KOODAM ANANDHANA TRUST, REP.…
“Section 125 CrPC has to be interpreted in a manner as to advance justice and to protect a woman for whose benefit the provisions have been engrafted.” HELD Application of Section 362 (CrPC) can be relaxed in proceedings under Section 125 (CrPC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SANJEEV KAPOOR — Appellant Vs. CHANDANA KAPOOR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Rajasthan Pre-emption Act 1966 – Sections 5(1)(c), 6, 6(1)(ii) and 6(3) – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 100 – Right of pre-emption – Whether a right of pre-emption was available to plaintiff who is alleged to be a joint owner in possession of the disputed courtyard. HELD plaintiff had a superior right of pre-emption by virtue of the provisions of Section 6(3) since he was the brother of the second defendant – First defendant has an inferior right of pre-emption as compared to plaintiff – Hence his claim cannot prevail over the superior right of pre-emption of plaintiff
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SURESH CHAND AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. SURESH CHANDER (DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND OTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and…
Right To Pension Cannot Be Taken Away By A Mere Executive Fiat Or Administrative Instruction: SC HELD “The right to receive pension has been held to be a right to property protected under Article 300A of the Constitution “
Right To Pension Cannot Be Taken Away By A Mere Executive Fiat Or Administrative Instruction: SC [Read Judgment] Ashok Kini 18 Feb 2020 6:54 PM Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and…







