When the statute provides a further remedy by way of appeal against the award and even against the order passed by the learned trial Court making the award a decree of the court, the High Court ought not to have entertained the writ petition
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH M/S. KELKAR AND KELKAR — Appellant Vs. M/S. HOTEL PRIDE EXECUTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna,…
Circumstantial evidence – Last seen theory, the arrest of the accused, the recovery of material objects and the call details produced, do not conclusively complete the chain of evidence and do not establish the fact accused committed the murder of the children –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH RAVINDER SINGH @ KAKU — Appellant Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit and Vineet Saran, JJ. ) Criminal…
Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 148 – Reassessment Notices – Revenue ought to have been permitted to proceed further with the reassessment proceedings as per the substituted provisions of sections 147 to 151 of the IT Act as per the Finance Act, 2021,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. ASHISH AGARWAL — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
Kerala Revocation of Arbitration Clauses and Reopening of Awards Act, 1998 (State Act), which has the effect of annulling the awards which have become “Rules of Court”, is a transgression on the judicial functions of the State and therefore, violative of doctrine of “separation of powers”
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. JAMES VARGHESE AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara…
Designating Senior Advocate – HELD clarify the situation and direct that instead of ten marks to be allocated to a counsel who has put in between ten to twenty years of practice, the marks be allocated commensurate with the standing of the person at the Bar, that is to say, one mark each shall be allocated for every year of practice between ten to twenty years.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH AMAR VIVEK AGGARWAL AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit,…
Criminal case indeed was of trivial nature – Order of discharge passed by the competent authority is not sustainable – Appeal allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PAWAN KUMAR — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
Insurance claims cannot be rejected on the basis of definition of terrorism in penal laws – When the policy itself defines the acts of terrorism in the Exclusion Clause, the terms of the policy being a concluded contract will govern the rights and liabilities of the parties
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NARSINGH ISPAT LIMITED — Appellant Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka, JJ.…
HELD bank guarantee given by the respondent is a performance bank guarantee – licensee did not commence its operations – Tribunal correct i holding bank guarantee could not be invoked
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. MILLENIUM DELHI BROADCAST LLP ETC. — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and B. R.…
Constitution of India – Article 72 – Balwant Singh Rajoana case – HELD in our view, there would be no embargo in considering the matter in the light of the directions issued by this Court in its order dated 04.12.2020. Furthermore, as the order had made it quite clear, the matter could be and had to be considered despite the pendency of the appeal preferred by the co-accused.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH BALWANT SINGH — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Pamidighantam Sri…
Recovery of increments after passage of ten years of retirement- excess payment was made by the employer by applying a wrong principle for calculating the pay/allowance – Not allowed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THOMAS DANIEL — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : S. Abdul Nazeer and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Civil…







