Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Chapter III B – Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958 and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011 will have no application to NonBanking Financial Companies (NBFCs) registered under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and regulated by Reserve Bank of India.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH NEDUMPILLI FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. )…
Execution of document – in a situation where an individual admits their signature on a document but denies its execution, the Sub-Registrar is bound to refuse registration in accordance with Sections 35(3)(a) of the Registration Act –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH VEENA SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LR — Appellant Vs. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR/ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (F/R) AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud,…
HELD it is clear that the authorities have acted arbitrarily in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India – the public law remedy has rightly been availed – Appeal dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MIHAN INDIA LIMITED — Appellant Vs. GMR AIRPORTS LIMITED AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Vineet Saran and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ. ) Civil…
HELD inter se merit would obviously depend upon the candidates facing the interview and to be appointed only if coming within the zone of selection as per the marks obtained by the last candidate in the category in which each of them had applied. No contempt made out.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH HARYANA STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION — Appellant Vs. PRIYANKA AND OTHERS ETC. — Respondent ( Before : Vineet Saran and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ. ) M.A.…
HELD what is applicable to the question of estoppel would not directly apply to the question of res judicata.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH V. PRAKASH @ G.N.V. PRAKASH — Appellant Vs. M/S. P.S. GOVINDASWAMY NAIDU AND SONS’ CHARITIES REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE AND OTHERS — Respondent…
HELD the reports relied on by the Director General, Mines and Geology and absolved the Appellant of indulging in any illegal mining activity on the ground that no evidence was found against the Appellant. There is no other material against the Appellant — Appeal allowed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH M/S HARYANA MINING COMPANY — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and B.R. Gavai, JJ.…
Partnership Act, 1932 – Dishonour of cheque – vicarious liability in the criminal law in terms of Section 141 of the NI Act cannot be fastened because of the civil liability – The Firm was not made an accused.- Appellant partner cannot be convicted.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH DILIP HARIRAMANI — Appellant Vs. BANK OF BARODA — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 767…
While maintaining the acquisition proceedings, the High Court granted a substantial relief to the land owners by directing payment of compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which is higher than the compensation payable under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – This approach cannot be faulted.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — Appellant Vs. RAVINDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka, JJ. )…
HELD uphold the conclusion of the CEC and revoke the approval granted by the Standing Committee of NBWL for doubling the railway line between Castlerock to Kulem.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao, B. R. Gavai…
It is also noted that the parties are living separately and there is no possibility of the parties reconciling their disputes and co-habiting together. HELD placed reliance on a judgment of this Court in the Case of “Amardeep Singh Versus Harveen Kaur” – [2017 (8) SCC 746]. Marriage dissolved by decree of mutual consent.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SINGLE BENCH POOJA BHUNESHWAR PRASAD SHARMA — Appellant Vs. ASHISH VINAYBHAI MISHRA — Respondent ( Before : B.V. Nagarathna, J. ) Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 618…








