Mandate of Section 207 of CrPC cannot be read as a provision etched in stone to cause serious violation of the rights of the accused as well as to the principles of natural justice – It must be emphasized that prosecution by the State ought to be carried out in a manner consistent with the right to fair trial, as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH S.P. VELUMANI — Appellant Vs. ARAPPOR IYAKKAM AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, CJI, Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli, JJ. )…
Gujarat Riots – Clean-Chit to Prime Minister Narendra Modi – Conspiracy cannot be readily inferred merely on the basis of the inaction or failure of the State administration.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI — Appellant Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ.…
Permission is granted to the applicants to enter into direct contracts to lift the excavated iron ore through inter State sales and also grant permission to the applicants to export the iron ore and pellets manufactured from the iron ore produced from the mines situated in the State of Karnataka
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, CJI, Krishna Murari and…
Participation was full and effective the exhortation by the appellants was consistent and cogent -and as such the appellants cannot escape the vicarious liability – They were thus rightly convicted under Section 302 read with 149 of the IPC.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH RISHIRAJ @ TUTUL MUKHARJEE AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and…
Appellant is complicit in the obstruction of justice – Finding of contempt, as well as the sentence cannot be regarded as disproportionate – Order of debarment from practicing for a period of one year and sentencing him to 2 weeks imprisonment is upheld.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH P R ADIKESAVAN — Appellant Vs. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud…
Appeal allowed – Rejection of candidates on technical ground ground of non-production of original certificates at the time of interview was improper, unjustified and not warranted –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH AARAV JAIN — Appellant Vs. THE BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : S. Abdul Nazeer and Vikram Nath, JJ.…
Bail canceled – Apprehension of the appellants and of the prosecution that the witnesses may be tampered with cannot be regarded as lacking in substance – Considering the nature and gravity of the offence
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MAMTA AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and Bela…
Order of stay of investigation against sahara group companies- Held, High Court was not justified in staying the investigation and in passing the consequential directions which have been passed in the impugned orders at the interlocutory stage.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SAHARA HOUSING INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr Dhananjaya Y…
Securities market deals with the wealth of investors – Any such manipulation is liable to cause serious detriment to investors’ wealth – HELD has prohibited the appellant from participating in its proprietary account for a specified period, leaving it open to the appellant to continue operation in their broking account.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MBL AND COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Vs. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA — Respondent ( Before : Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Bela…
Court Fees Act, 1870 – Section 7(iv)(d) – Market value of the immovable property – the valuation of any particular suit has to be decided primarily with reference to the relief/reliefs claimed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH BHARAT BHUSHAN GUPTA — Appellant Vs. PRATAP NARAIN VERMA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Civil…