HELD all the three appellants are in jail and have undergone several years of incarceration. We accordingly award the sentence for the period already undergone by all the three appellants.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH AJMAL — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF KERALA — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 1838…
Matter remanded back – High Court fell in error in not taking into consideration the relevant material and instead relying upon inadmissible evidence or evidence which had no bearing to the findings. Even the burden had been wrongly placed on the defendant-appellant.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH FAROOQI BEGUM (D) BY LRS. — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : S. Abdul Nazeer and Vikram Nath,…
HELD in a suit challenging revocation of the respective licenses, the plaintiffs cannot be permitted to challenge the respective mortgages / charges created on the entire premises as void ab-initio. the amendment of plaint and addition of parties by original plaintiffs disallowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LIMITED — Appellant Vs. ALOK KUMAR LODHA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. )…
Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 – Section 9A(2) – Partition – Preliminary decree for partition granted in the suit of the year 1929 was never given effect to – There was no evidence to show who among the two namely, ‘S’ and ‘R’ died first, the Deputy Director of Consolidation righty found it equitable to distribute ‘S’ 1/3rd share equally between the branches of ‘R’ and ‘J’.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SARJU MISHRA (D) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. JANGI (D) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Hemant Gupta and…
Insurance Claim – Deficiency in service – Delay in processing the claim and delay in repudiation could be one of the several factors for holding an insurer guilty of deficiency in service – But it cannot be the only factor – There was no categorical evidence of any deficiency in service on the part of the Insurance Company.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. SHASHIKALA J. AYACHI — Respondent ( Before : Hemant Gupta and V.…
HELD we direct that in terms of the admitted fact by extended Lease Agreement and the increase in the percentage of rent, the Trial Court shall first decide the issue of payment of monthly rent applying the said increase on year to year basis and pass appropriate orders – Remanded
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH KARAN KAPOOR — Appellant Vs. MADHURI KUMAR — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 4545 of…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 302 – Death sentence – Murder during the course of robbery – Imposition of death sentence would be unwarranted
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH MANOJ AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Bela. M.…
Court Fees Act, 1870 – Section 7(iv)(d) – nature of relief claimed in the plaint which is decisive of the question of suit valuation -market value does attain significance just because suit relates to immoveable property.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH BHARAT BHUSHAN GUPTA — Appellant Vs. PRATAP NARAIN VERMA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Civil…
SARFAESI Act – jurisdiction of Civil Court is barred except for one exception of FRAUD which has to be proved as laid in Order VI, Rule 4 of CPC
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH CHARU KISHOR MEHTA — Appellant Vs. PRAKASH PATEL AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : C.T. Ravikumar and Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ. ) Special Leave…
Detenue declared a “goonda” HELD “Maintenance of public order” has a crucial bearing here and unless the Government is justified in holding that the act of the detenu is prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, the preventive detention would be bad
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SHAIK NAZNEEN — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : C.T. Ravikumar and Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ. ) Criminal…