Civil Suit – Declaration and possession – Claim of Title – A special Act without authority of law, any order or decree so passed through such unlawful exercise of power, will be a legal nullity
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH S. KULDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. S. PRITHPAL SINGH — Respondent ( Before : K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) Civil…
Acts of provocation on the basis of which the appellant caused the death of his brother, were both sudden and grave and that there was loss of self-control – This Court convert the conviction of the appellant from Section 302 to Part I of Section 304 of the IPC.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH DAUVARAM NIRMALKAR — Appellant Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — Respondent ( Before : Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No.…
If in lieu of actual appointment, the writ petitioner is awarded a sum of Rs. 7.5 lakhs as compensation with 6 per cent interest from September, 2013 onwards till the actual payment is made, the same will meet the ends of justice.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION — Appellant Vs. SANDEEP KAUSHIK AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
High Court ought to have considered the writ petition preferred by the workman on merits and ought to have given some findings on the order passed by the Labour Court rejecting the 33(C) (2) application – Order passed by High Court is quashed and set aside – Matter is remitted back to the High Court.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH M/S MITRA S.P. (P) LTD. AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. DHIREN KUMAR — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. )…
Even the complainant also in complaint has not named appellant as the perpetrator of the offence, rather stated suspects foul play – Appellant stands discharged from the charges framed against him.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH VIKRAMJIT KAKATI — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No(s).…
It appropriate and proper to remand the matter to the High Court to consider the writ petition afresh and after giving an opportunity to Nagar Panchayat herein to file additional counter affidavit along with supporting documents and thereafter to give the opportunity to the original writ petitioners to rebut the same.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SHIRDI NAGAR PANCHAYAT, SHIRDI — Appellant Vs. APPASAHEB NARAYAN CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. )…
Initiating frivolous criminal actions against large corporations, would give rise to adverse economic consequences for the country in the long run. Therefore, the Regulator must be cautious in initiating such an action and carefully weigh each factor.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED — Appellant Vs. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, CJI., J.K. Maheshwari…
Reversion of Navy Officer – Possession of objectionable articles including pornographic magazines – Conduct of the appellant as reflected from record, certainly supports the conclusion that he lacked the qualities which an officer of Navy must possess
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH K. S. SAHU — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and M. M. Sundresh, JJ.…
Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 – Section 45 – Grant of occupancy rights – Scope and purport of the two Acts being different, termination of the proceedings under the Karnataka (Personal and Miscellaneous) Inams Abolition Act, 1954 in regard to grant of occupancy rights cannot bar an enquiry to establish the claim under Section 45 of the Act, 1961 by the Land Tribuna
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH PILLAMMA (DEAD) AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. M. RAMAIAH REDDY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and C.T.…
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Section 311 – Power to summon – In terms of Section 311 of the CrPC, to summon and examine or recall and re-examine any material witness at any stage and the closing of prosecution evidence is not an absolute bar.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH VARSHA GARG — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and AS Bopanna,…