Social Media Posts — Content-Related Offenses — Retaliatory Action — Quashing of Proceedings — While the court made no final determination on the nature of the petitioner’s social media posts, it acknowledged the petitioner’s counsel’s submission that the tweets were ‘retaliatory’ and were made in response to an incident involving a social media influencer. This assertion formed part of the petitioner’s argument for quashing or consolidating the numerous FIRs, suggesting a motive beyond simple offensive content.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH WAZAHAT KHAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ( Before : K.V. Viswanathan and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ. ) Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 247…
Legal Profession — Autonomy and Independence — Administration of Justice — Role of Lawyers — Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India — Impact of direct summons to defence counsel by Investigating Agencies on the autonomy of the legal profession and the independence of the administration of justice — Need for judicial oversight.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ASHWINKUMAR GOVINDBHAI PRAJAPATI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER ( Before : K.V. Viswanathan and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ. ) Petition(s) for Special Leave…
Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well
The Supreme Court recently observed that the principle of res judicata not only applies to different sets of proceedings but also to different stages of the same proceedings. Holding thus,…
Developer liable for refund with agreed interest for delayed possession; interest on allottee’s loan not developer’s direct liability, though loan financing can be a factor in awarding general compensation
2025 INSC 808 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER (H) Vs. ANUPAM GARG ETC. ( Before : Sanjay Karol and…
Constitution of India — Article 20(3) — Right Against Self-Incrimination — Constitutional Validity of Narco-Analysis Test — Forced Tests Raise Serious Questions — Involuntary Administration Hit by Article 20(3) – Involuntary Narco-Analysis Test — Contravention of Rights — Results Not ‘Material Evidence’ — Violates ‘Substantive Due Process’ — Breaches Privacy Boundaries.
2025 INSC 810 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH AMLESH KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No…..of…
Demand notices for misdeclaration of goods under Section 66 of the Railways Act, 1989 are valid even if raised after delivery of goods, unlike punitive charges for overloading which must be recovered before delivery.
2025 INSC 805 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S KAMAKHYA TRANSPORT PVT. LTD. ETC.ETC. ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. )…
High Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is limited to determining a prima facie case from the FIR, without appreciating defence evidence or conducting a mini-trial.
2025 INSC 807 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ABHISHEK SINGH Vs. AJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Manoj Misra, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No….of 2025…
For Section 387 IPC, putting someone in fear of death/grievous hurt to commit extortion is sufficient; delivery of property is not required.
2025 INSC 806 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S. BALAJI TRADERS Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ. )…
A Court of Sessions can cancel bail granted by a higher court for violation of conditions it imposed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. VINAY RAJASHEKHARAPPA KULKARNI ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. ….of 2025…
Preventive detention under the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007 must be strictly construed, used sparingly for ‘public order’ threats, not ‘law and order’ issues, and not as an alternative to cancelling bail.
2025 INSC 809 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DHANYAM Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS ( Before : Sanjay Karol and Manmohan, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 2897 of…








