HELD ex-parte judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court as well as the order(s) passed by the learned Trial Court refusing to condone the delay of 2345 days in preferring the revision petition(s) challenging the ex-parte judgment and decree filed by original defendant Nos. 2 to 4 is/are hereby restored
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MOHAMED ALI — Appellant Vs. V. JAYA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…
Union of India prayed transferring all writs challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015 HELD the prayer for transfer of the subject petitions is declined and all the interim stay orders are vacated while providing that it shall be permissible for the parties to request the respective High Courts for expeditious hearing and disposal .
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA ETC. — Appellant Vs. THE UNITED PLANTERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN INDIA ETC. ETC. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh…
Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 – Section 42(6) – Audit assessment – Further time – Power of Commissioner/ Assessing Authority — Necessity for referring the matter to three-Judges is to have consistency and clarity in the law of precedents and certainly to avoid having multiple judgements drawing subtle distinction between one another.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX ODISHA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. M/S. ESSEL MINING AND INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Uday…
Respondent being an OBC cannot be retained in a ST category post – Respondent is disentitled to any pensionary benefit by virtue of his wrongful appointment.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BHILAI STEEL PLANT, BHILAI — Appellant Vs. MAHESH KUMAR GONNADE AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul…
HELD by permitting plaintiffs to amend the plaint including a prayer clause nature of the suit is likely to be changed, in that case, the Court would not be justified in allowing the amendment. It would also result in misjoinder of causes of action.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LIMITED — Appellant Vs. ALOK KUMAR LODHA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. )…
PCA & IPC – HELD the recovery of the tickets is found to have not been made in accordance with law, nor the seized tickets could be connected to the three different buses and the conductors manning the said buses (the appellants), it would not be safe to rely upon the unconfirmed tickets to connect them to the appellants – Prosecution did not proceed with application for secondary evidence qua enquiry report.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH JARNAIL SINGH AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Law of Evidence Evidence – Non-recovery of weapon – When there is ample ocular evidence corroborated by medical evidence, mere non-recovery of weapon from the appellant would not materially affect the case of the prosecution.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MEKALA SIVAIAH — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari and Krishna Murari, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 – Rule 12 – Disability Pension – Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 are beneficial in nature and ought to be liberally construed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. EX. NAIK RAM SINGH — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and M.M. Sundresh, JJ.…
Anticipatory Bail- NDPS – 50,000 Tramadol tablets – Expression “reasonable grounds” used in clause (b) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 37 would mean credible, plausible and grounds for the Court to believe that the accused person is not guilty of the alleged offence – Bail order releasing the respondent on post-arrest bail, is quashed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU — Appellant Vs. MOHIT AGGARWAL — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, CJI., Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli, JJ. ) Criminal…
Disability pension – Respondent was discharge form service on administrative grounds, not medical grounds – Claim of disability pension should not have been entertained and that too, 20 years after discharge.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. EX. SEP. R. MUNUSAMY — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. )…