(CrPC) – Section 167 – Default bail – 60/90 day remand period under Section 167 CrPC ought to be computed from the date when a Magistrate authorizes remand HELD the very moment the stipulated 60/90 day remand period expires, an indefeasible right to default bail accrues to the accused.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. KAPIL WADHAWAN AND ANOTHER ETC. — Respondent ( Before : K.M. Joseph, Hrishikesh Roy and B.V.…
Rajya Sabha Elections – Open Ballot System – In a case of “proportional representation”, voters are subject to party discipline – It is legitimately open to prescribe the methodology of an open ballot for conducting elections to the Council of States.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH LOK PRAHARI — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI., Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and…
Illegal manufacture and transportation of spurious liquor – State of Punjab is directed to continue the steps to stop the illegal manufacture and transportation of spurious liquor and to stop the illegal Bhatthis
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH TARSEM JODHAN AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ.…
Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 – Appellate Tribunal for Electricity – As a judicial tribunal, dealing with contracts and bargains, which are entered into by parties with equal bargaining power, APTEL is not expected to casually render findings of coercion, or fraud, without proper pleadings or proof, or without probing into evidence. The findings of coercion are therefore, set aside.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. RENEW WIND ENERGY (RAJKOT) PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay…
Murder – Acquittal – Testimony of injured witnesses, cannot be believed, adverse inference will have to be drawn on account of the prosecution’s failure to examine the three eyewitnesses – Prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt – Appeal allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SITA RAM — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal, JJ. ) Criminal…
“Consumer” – Commercial purpose – whether the insurance service has a close and direct nexus with the profit generating activity and whether the dominant intention or dominant purpose for the transaction was to facilitate some kind of profit generation for the purchaser and/or their beneficiary – Insured is a commercial enterprise is unrelated to the determination of whether the insurance policy shall be counted as a commercial purpose
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. — Appellant Vs. HARSOLIA MOTORS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. ) Civil…
Dismissal of the special leave petition in limine does not amount to affirmation of the view taken by the High Court. Unless the judgment of the High Court is affirmed, at least, with short reasoning, the same would not amount to binding precedent.
“The State or its instrumentalities cannot be permitted to adopt an attitude of pick and choose.If the State has accepted the award of the Reference Court in respect of some…
CPC – Order VII R 11 -Merely because there were some inconsistent averments in the plaint, that was not sufficient to come to a conclusion that the cause of action was not disclosed in the plaint. The question was whether the plaint discloses cause of action.
“For dealing with an application under Rule 11 of Order VII of CPC, only the averments made in the plaint and the documents produced along with the plaint are required…
Mosquito Mats, Coils and Vaporizers, Mortein Insect Killers, Harpic Toilet Cleaner and Lizol Floor Cleaners, are not be classifiable under Entry 44(5) of the 3rd Schedule to the Kerala VAT Act (KVAT), 2003 as ‘insecticides’.
Kerala VAT Act, 2003 Mosquito Mats, Coils and Vaporizers, Mortein Insect Killers, Harpic Toilet Cleaner and Lizol Floor Cleaners, are not be classifiable under Entry 44(5) as ‘insecticides’, observing…
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 14 – Penalty imposed must be commensurate with the gravity of the misconduct, and that any penalty disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution – In the armed forces of the Union, including the paramilitary forces, utmost discipline, unity of command et al are the sine qua non – That said, the doctrine of proportionality still holds the field.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH B. S. HARI COMMANDANT — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. R1: UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS R2: DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER…








