Limitation Archives - Page 9 of 10 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

May 6, 2025 12:57 pm

Property Tax–Determination of–Date of order made–Not correct that the date of the order ‘made’ in terms of Section 126(4) of the Act should be taken to be the date when the same was communicated to the assessee and not the one when it was signed.

Jul 31, 2017 sclaw

2007(5) LAW HERALD (SC) 3506 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harjit Singh Bedi Civil Appeal No. 3303 of…

Limitation

Limitation—Exclusion of Time—Both due diligence and good faith must be established. Limitation—Exclusion of Time—Nothing shall be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention.

Jun 1, 2017 sclaw

2016(5) Law Herald (P&H) 3748 (SC) : 2016 LawHerald.Org 2355 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali…

Limitation

Limitation Act, 1963 – Article 137 – Limitation – Suit for distribution of property – Limitation of three years commences when right to apply accrues – Last communication made on 29-9-1989 – Suit filed on 8-5-1992 within time.

May 27, 2017 sclaw

AIR 2006 SC 2488 : (2006) 2 ARBLR 1 : (2006) 2 CTC 597 : (2006) 4 JT 251 : (2006) 4 SCALE 74 : (2006) 4 SCC 658…

Limitation

Exparte decree—Setting aside of–Limitation will begin from the date of knowledge of passing of the said exparte decree. Summons–It is obligatory on the part of the Court to send a copy of the plaint and other documents appended thereto, in terms of order 5, Rule 2 CPC

Apr 16, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1816 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 714 of…

Limitation

Declaratory decree—Limitation—Where no proceeding is initiated under Order XII R. 9 (2) CPC the abatement culminates into finally and gives a new starting point for the period of limitation.

Apr 15, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1837 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 2370 of…

Limitation

Adverse Possession—Adverse possession is a right which comes into play not just because someone loses his right to reclaim the property out of continuous and willful neglect but also on account of possessor’s positive intent to dispossess.

Apr 14, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1655 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 7062 of…

Limitation

Adverse Possession— Once the plaintiff proves his title, the burden shifts to the defendant to establish that he has perfected his title by adverse possession.

Apr 12, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1452 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 6195 of 2000…

Limitation

Adverse possession—A person who bases his title on adverse possession must show by clear and unequivocal evidence that his possession was hostile to the real owner and amounted to denial of his title to the property claimed.

Apr 12, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1446 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 5846 of…

Limitation

Condonation of delay of 971 days in filing appeal—Delay properly explained and was rightly condoned

Apr 10, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1393 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.K. Thakker The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harjit Singh Bedi Civil Appeal No. 1576…

Limitation

Wakf Act, 1995 – Sections 6 and 83(a) – Wakf of property – Suit for declaration – Limitation –

Apr 9, 2017 sclaw

(2005) 1 JT 67 : (2005) 1 SCC 741 : (2005) 1 SCR 1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ABDUL RAIS AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. MADHYA PRADESH WAKF BOARD…

You missed

Service

Under Rule 17, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, prior contractual service counts towards pension upon subsequent regularisation, subject to the employee opting to refund/forgo specified monetary benefits.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

I B C

Service of an IBC Section 8 demand notice upon Key Managerial Personnel at the Corporate Debtor’s registered office constitutes valid service on the company, emphasizing substance over technical form.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

High Court’s inherent power to quash criminal proceedings precludes conducting a ‘mini trial’ by assessing evidence credibility; consistency requires acknowledging coordinate bench decisions involving co-accused.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

Quashing FIR under 482 CrPC impermissible when complaint prima facie discloses cognizable offences; allegations accepted true, investigation not thwarted based on delay, civil suit, or witness status if complicity alleged.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Category: Limitation

You missed