Corruption Archives - Page 7 of 7 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

August 7, 2025 9:22 am

Sanction–Effect of reinstatement–Accused was not in government service on the day the charge sheet was filed–Protection not aviable.

Apr 24, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2345 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Criminal Appeal No. 1205 of…

Corruption

Sanction for prosecution–Defective sanction–Acquittal not justified.

Apr 22, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2216 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 1009 of…

Corruption

Assets Disproportionate to known sources of income—Territorial jurisdiction—Accused have several bank accounts and properties in Delhi—Court at Delhi would have the jurisdiction even though he was never posted in Delhi.

Apr 13, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1546 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Criminal Appeal No. 635 of…

Corruption

Sanction for Prosecution—Sanction not required under the prevention of corruption act and factual aspects are of no consequence.

Apr 13, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1520 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Criminal Appeal No. 527…

Corruption

Public Servant—Employees of Electricity Board are public servant and liable to prosecution for corruption under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Apr 12, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1492 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Criminal Appeal No. 519 of 2007…

Corruption

Sanction for prosecution–Previous sanction under Prevention of Corruption Act is not necessary, if the public servant does not hold the same office which he allegedly abused on the date when the cognizance was taken by the Court.

Apr 6, 2017 sclaw

2007(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 282 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Criminal Appeal No. 1276 of 2006…

Corruption

Sanction for prosecution—Charges related to period when accused were Ministers and Chief-Minister—Cognizance of offence taken by Court when the accused ceased to be Ministers but were members of Legislative Assembly or M.P.—Sanction for prosecution under Section 19(1) of the Penal Code Act not required.

Apr 6, 2017 sclaw

2007(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 142 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Civil Appeal No. 5636 of 2006…

Acquittal Corruption

Illegal Gratification–In the absence of proof of demand, the question raising the presumption would not arose. Sanction–Sanctioning authority did not apply their mind to entire material on record–Sanction is vitiated in law.

Mar 28, 2017 sclaw

2007(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandeya Katju Appeal (Crl.) 970 of…

You missed

Constitution

Constitution of India, 1950 — Tenth Schedule, Para 6(1) — Disqualification of Members — Speaker’s authority to decide — Judicial review of Speaker’s decision — Scope of — Decision of Speaker is amenable to judicial review on grounds of jurisdictional errors, mala fides, non-compliance with natural justice, and perversity.

Aug 5, 2025 sclaw

Evidence Act Juvenile Justice

Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 35 — Relevancy of entries in public records — Entries made by public servants in discharge of official duty or by other persons in performance of a duty enjoined by law are relevant facts. — Family Register maintained under the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, and Voters’ List are considered public records and public documents. — School records from a private, though government-recognized, school are not public documents, and the headmaster is not a public servant for the purposes of Section 35.

Aug 5, 2025 sclaw

Labour Cases

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Section 12(3) — Memorandum of Settlement — Binding nature — Clause 14 of 1979 settlement providing alternate employment for colour blind drivers held valid and enforceable despite subsequent 1986 settlement and policy circulars — 1986 settlement did not expressly supersede 1979 settlement and was general in nature, while 1979 settlement was specific to colour blindness and did not contain a termination clause, thus operating harmoniously.

Aug 5, 2025 sclaw

I P C

Criminal proceedings may be quashed if allegations, even when uncontroverted, fail to establish an offense, considering freedom of speech and assembly.

Aug 1, 2025 sclaw

Category: Corruption

You missed