Consumer Archives - Page 11 of 21 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

April 7, 2025 2:35 pm

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to look into the matter, and take necessary steps so that this practice is discontinued, and the reasoned Judgment is passed alongwith the operative order

Feb 21, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SUDIPTA CHAKROBARTY AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. RANAGHAT S.D. HOSPITAL AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. )…

Consumer

Consumer – District Forum has no power to extend the time to file the response to the complaint beyond the period of 15 days in addition to 30 days as is envisaged under Section 13 of the Act

Feb 14, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S DADDY’S BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. MANISHA BHARGAVA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and…

Consumer

Housing – Allotment of plot – Non-Participation of Allotment Process – Availability of the plot does not give any entitlement to a person who has no right to claim allotment – Any allotment has to be made in accordance with the procedure prescribed and the Rules of the Parishad

Feb 14, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH U.P. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. NAMIT SHARMA — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ.…

Consumer

Apartment Buyer’s Agreement – Unfair trade practice – Incorporation of such one-sided and unreasonable clauses in the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement constitutes an unfair trade practice under Section 2(1) (r) of the C P A. HELD intent is clear that a choice or discretion is given to the allottee whether he wishes to initiate appropriate proceedings under the CP Act or file an application under the RERA Act.

Jan 17, 2021 sclaw

1/37 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD — Appellant Vs. ABHISHEK KHANNA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra…

Consumer

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 – Sections 79 – Bar of jurisdiction – Consumer complaint by allottee against builder – Section 79 of the RERA Act does not in any way bar the Commission or Forum under the provisions of the CP Act to entertain any complaint.

Nov 3, 2020 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S. IMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED — Appellant Vs. ANIL PATNI AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit and Vineet Saran, JJ. )…

Consumer

HELD the Financier can take possession of the vehicle if hirer does not pay installments ” However, such repossession cannot be taken by recourse to physical violence, assault and/or criminal intimidation. Nor can such possession be taken by engaging gangsters, goons and muscle men as so called Recovery Agents”

Oct 2, 2020 sclaw

The financier continues to be owner of the goods being the subject of hire purchase, until the option to purchase is exercised by the hirer, upon payment of all amounts…

Consumer

“In our view, having regard to Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, an appeal will not lie to this court against an order which has been passed in the course of execution proceedings. The appeals are hence dismissed as not being maintainable.”

Sep 1, 2020 sclaw

“In our view, having regard to Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, an appeal will not lie to this court against an order which has been passed in…

Consumer

Developers sell dreams to home buyers. Implicit in their representations is that the facilities which will be developed will provide convenience of living and a certain lifestyle. Developer who has breached a clear representation, is accountable to the process of law. The flat buyers are entitled to compensation for delayed handing over of possession and for the failure of the developer to fulfil the representations made to flat buyers in regard to the provision of amenities. Order of NCDRC set aside as patently erroneous. Appeal allowed.

Aug 24, 2020 sclaw

Developers sell dreams to home buyers. Implicit in their representations is that the facilities which will be developed by the developer will provide convenience of living and a certain lifestyle…

Consumer

Consumer Law–Negligence–Meaning of–Negligence is the breach of a duty caused by omission to do something which a reasonable man guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do–Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Aug 23, 2020 sclaw

2009(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 1640 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dalveer Bhandari The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harjit Singh Bedi Civil Appeal No. 6168 of…

Consumer

HELD A hospital which renders free services to a certain category of patients, while providing services which are charged to the bulk of others would not lie outside the purview of the consumer fora. Indian Medical Association v V P Shantha 1995 SCC (6) 651 followed. SCOI left open the issue as to whether Safdarjung Hospital would be governed by the provisions of the Act as contained in Section 2(1)(o) (Service).

Aug 1, 2020 sclaw

The Supreme Court has observed that it is only where a hospital provides medical services free of charge across the board to all patients that it would stand outside the…

You missed

Service

Supreme Court Rejects UCO Bank’s Plea That Employee Dismissed For Misconduct Wasn’t Entitled To Pension Despite 10 Yrs Service

Apr 6, 2025 sclaw

Constitution

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to look into the matter, and take necessary steps so that this practice is discontinued, and the reasoned Judgment is passed alongwith the operative order

Consumer – District Forum has no power to extend the time to file the response to the complaint beyond the period of 15 days in addition to 30 days as is envisaged under Section 13 of the Act

Housing – Allotment of plot – Non-Participation of Allotment Process – Availability of the plot does not give any entitlement to a person who has no right to claim allotment – Any allotment has to be made in accordance with the procedure prescribed and the Rules of the Parishad

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 – Sections 79 – Bar of jurisdiction – Consumer complaint by allottee against builder – Section 79 of the RERA Act does not in any way bar the Commission or Forum under the provisions of the CP Act to entertain any complaint.

“In our view, having regard to Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, an appeal will not lie to this court against an order which has been passed in the course of execution proceedings. The appeals are hence dismissed as not being maintainable.”

You missed

Supreme Court Rejects UCO Bank’s Plea That Employee Dismissed For Misconduct Wasn’t Entitled To Pension Despite 10 Yrs Service

Even As We Near 80 Yrs Of Independence, Not Enough Public Jobs Generated For Eligible Candidates

IBC | Difference Between ‘Avoidance Transactions’ & ‘Fraudulent Or Wrongful Trading’

Wife Can Be Affected By Defamation Of Husband; Apart From Individual Reputations, Spouses Share Common Family Reputation

Supreme Court of India Judgements

Category: Consumer

You missed