Arbitration Archives - Page 8 of 31 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

October 24, 2025 6:21 am

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 31(7)(b) – Post-award interest – If the arbitrator does not grant postaward interest, the award holder is entitled to post-award interest at eighteen percent.

Sep 4, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDITS PVT. LTD. — Appellant Vs. VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and AS Bopanna,…

Arbitration

All disputes between the parties to the lease with regard to renewal and/or non-renewal, the period of renewal and the quantum of rent would have be decided by the Arbitrator – Dispute arising out of non-renewal of the lease is clearly arbitrable

Aug 30, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH BRIJ RAJ OBEROI — Appellant Vs. THE SECRETARY, TOURISM AND CIVIL AVIATION DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and C.…

Arbitration

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – High Courts cannot entertain plea of executing award passed by arbitral tribunal

Aug 29, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. SHEETAL JAIDEV VADE AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna,…

Arbitration

Respondent-claimant earlier initiated the arbitration proceedings under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act in the Court at Vishakhapatnam – Only the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati would have jurisdiction to entertain the application under Section 11(6) of the Act – Appeal allowed.

Aug 16, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH GENERAL MANAGER EAST COAST RAILWAY RAIL SADAN AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah…

Arbitration

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11(6) – Appointment of sole arbitrator – No arbitration agreement between the parties – Invocation of the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 11(6) of the 1996 Act was not valid.

Aug 16, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. M/S IVRCL AMR JOINT VENTURE — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and A…

Arbitration

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11(6) – Once an arbitrator is not appointed as per the agreed procedure within stipulated time, right of the party concerned to appoint an arbitrator is forfeited.

Aug 15, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH M/S CONTINENTAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED — Appellant Vs. GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAY — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. )…

Arbitration

HELD arbitration proceedings earlier initiated in the Court at Vishakhapatnam only High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati would have jurisdiction to entertain the application under Section 11(6) of the Act and not Orrisa High court

Jul 26, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH GENERAL MANAGER EAST COAST RAILWAY RAIL SADAN AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah…

Arbitration

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11 – Appointment of Arbitrator – Even at the stage of deciding Section 11 application, the Court may prima facie consider even the aspect with regard to ‘accord and satisfaction’ of the claims.

Jul 22, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED — Appellant Vs. NCC LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…

Arbitration

Questions of law – Whether the Group of Companies Doctrine should be read into Section 8 of the Act or whether it can exist in Indian jurisprudence independent of any statutory provision? – Issues referred to larger bench.

May 15, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH COX AND KINGS LIMITED — Appellant Vs. SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, CJI, A.S. Bopanna and…

Arbitration

Appointment of Arbitrator – Absence of Written Agreement – Absence of any written contract containing the arbitration agreement, section 11(6) of the Act, 1996 shall not be applicable

May 15, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SWADESH KUMAR AGARWAL — Appellant Vs. DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL AND OTHERS, ETC., ETC. — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.…

You missed

Cr P C

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 451 & 457 — Release of Seized Property — Trial Court rejecting release application for iron ore on grounds of applicant’s failure to substantiate ownership — High Court setting aside trial court’s order without examining correctness of its finding on ownership — High Court should have either agreed with trial court’s finding on ownership or recorded reasons for disagreeing — Failure to do so warrants interference and remand.

Oct 12, 2025 sclaw

Evidence Act

Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 50 — Opinion as to relationship, when relevant — Opinion expressed by conduct of person with special knowledge on relationship is relevant — Essentials are court’s opinion, expression through conduct, and person having special knowledge — Conduct alone is not proof but an intermediate step to infer opinion — Opinion must be proved by direct evidence — Court needs to weigh evidence to form its own conclusion; Trial Court erred in treating opinion of witnesses as fact rather than evidence to be weighed and failed to independently assess credibility.

Oct 12, 2025 sclaw

Anticipatory Bail Corruption

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Bail — Anticipatory Bail — Supreme Court granted leave to appeal against High Court’s rejection of bail in anticipation of arrest — Custodial interrogation not required — Appellant may be admitted to bail in anticipation of arrest upon arrest, subject to terms and conditions fixed by the trial court — Appellant directed not to dissuade witnesses from disclosing facts to authorities.

Oct 12, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 366 — Death Sentence Reference — Sentencing Procedure — Conviction and death penalty were pronounced on the same day without a proper inquiry into aggravating and mitigating circumstances, psychological evaluation, or jail conduct report. This haste violated established sentencing principles and vitiated the death sentence.

Oct 12, 2025 sclaw

Category: Arbitration

You missed