Refund of amount then they should produce the relevant records, duly certified by a competent authority which is acceptable in a Court of law, indicating the sources from which they got the money for repayment
(2014) 2 SCALE 569 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA v S.E.B.I. — Appellant Vs. SAHARA INDIA REAL. ESTATE CORPN. LTD. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan,…
Punjab Civil Services Rules – Rule 6.16-B(a) – Appointment – Whether the brother of the deceased employee who died in harness is eligible for employment on compassionate grounds –
(1996) 1 AD 827 : (1996) 2 LLJ 691 : (1996) 1 SCALE 605 : (1996) 7 SCC 262 : (1995) 6 SCR 175 Supp : (1996) 1 UJ…
There was a re-count of the rejected votes and, therefore, no grievance could be made on that count and so far as the dead electors are concerned, only at the best, four persons took the ballot papers as deposed by the Tehsildar and even if it is assumed that those four persons voted for the successful candidate, it does not materially affect the election – Appeal dismissed.
(1998) 8 SCC 695 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SATHI ROOP LAL — Appellant Vs. MALTI THAPAR (MRS) — Respondent ( Before : A. M. Ahmadii, C.J; B. N. Kirpal,…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 34, 120B, 302, 364A, 386, 511 —Conviction for offence — The Appellant aggrieved by his conviction for offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced — the recovery of The dead body on the statements made by the accused from the house in their possession has been proved.
(2014) 1 CCR 398 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA VIJAY KUMAR — Appellant Vs. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI — Respondent ( Before : J.S. Khehar, J; C.K. Prasad, J )…
Payment of No. 35 per month to UDCs discharging special duties of onerous nature, is personal pay so long as they discharge the same. Therefore, other UDCs who do not perform the special duties, though seniors, do not ipso facto get the same pay on the posit of equal pay due to juniors getting higher pay
(1996) 1 AD 980 : (1996) 83 ELT 485 : (1996) 1 JT 709 : (1996) 1 SCALE 696 : (1996) 7 SCC 275 : (1996) 1 SCR 841 :…
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, the High Court ought not to have taken a strict view of the matter because the delay was not deliberate and there was nothing on the record to show that the appellant had acquiesced in the matter
(1998) 8 SCC 698 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MANICKRAM — Appellant Vs. BALUKHAN — Respondent ( Before : A. M. Ahmadii, C.J; Sujata V. Manohar, J; B. N. Kirpal,…
Temporary Employee should be given equal Salary as Regular Employee
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:- Jagdish Singh Khehar and S.A. Bobde, JJ. Civil Appeal No. 213 Of 2013. D/d. 26.10.2016. State of Punjab & Ors. – Appellants Versus Jagjit Singh…
Quashment—High Court quashed the summoning orders by relying on statements of witness recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C.—Whether proper ? NO.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2420 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.P. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeP.K. Balasubramanyan Criminal Appeal No. 1019 of 2007…
Disproportionate assets—Conviction–Court have analysed the evidence in great details as the valuation of the properties—Appeal dismissed.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2444 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeP.P. Naolekar Civil Appeal No. 1262 of 2001…
House Tax— State Government has given exemption to the self occupied residential houses from the payment of house tax—But not to self occupied commercial premises—Whether proper ? YES. Jurisdiction of High Court— The court cannot usurp the functions assigned to the legislative bodies under the Constitution and even indirectly require the legislature to exercise its power of law making in particular manner.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2429 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia The Hon’ble Mr. JusticeB. Sudershan Reddy Civil Appeal No. 684 of…