Income Tax Act, 1961 – Section 275(1), 275(1)(a) -Period of limitation – Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income- Tax Appellate Tribunal failed to appreciate that the period of limitation in the instant case is governed by the provisions of Section 275(1) as the penalty was initiated in the assessment order itself and the penalty order was issued within time in accordance with the provisions of Section 275(1)(a) of the Income- Tax Act, 1961
(2013) 217 TAXMAN 400 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX — Appellant Vs. KEDIA POWER LTD. — Respondent ( Before : H.L. Dattu, J; Dipak Misra, J…
The seats having been moulded for use as parts of these motor vehicles, the entry that more specifically applied was Tariff Item 34-A – Appeal dismissed.
(1997) 91 ELT 265 : (1998) 8 SCC 370 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA M.M. RUBBER CO. LTD. — Appellant Vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS — Respondent ( Before…
Appellants are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and they are also ready to appear at the police station concerned for investigation – Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, court grant bail to the appellants,
(2004) 13 SCC 521 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PANDURANG BALIRAMJI KHARAD — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — Respondent ( Before : Shivaraj V. Patil, J; B.N. Srikrishna, J…
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 7, Rule 11 – Application for rejection of plaint, such application can be decided by the Court on the basis of averments made in the plaint and for that purpose, filing of written statements by the defendant will not be necessary for exercising such power under Order 7, Rule 11.
AIR 2003 SC 759 : (2003) 1 DMC 166 : (2002) 10 JT 558 : (2003) 1 SCC 557 : (2002) 5 SCR 491 Supp : (2003) 1 UJ…
Under the circumstances, the High Court should have suspended the sentence and granted bail to the appellant also. He also submitted that the High Court did not consider any one of the contentions raised in the application seeking suspension of sentence
(2004) 13 SCC 507 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JAGAN ALIAS JAGAN NATH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA — Respondent ( Before : Shivaraj V. Patil, J; B.N. Srikrishna,…
Examination of reports – The case arises of alleged ill-treatment of appellant by her husband and her father. The case is going on since 29th July, 1995. Appellant came up against the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate on 29th July, 1995 ordering to be admitted to Delhi Psychiatry center, 35, Defence Enclave, Vikas Marg, New Delhi, for observation and treatment
(1997) 2 Crimes 62 : (1997) 5 JT 120 : (1997) 3 SCALE 761 : (1997) 5 SCC 346 : (1997) 1 UJ 736 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ANAMIKA…
A junior officer belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes, by operation of Article 16(1) read with Atricle 16(4) and 16(4A) would steal a march over his erstwhile seniors in the lower cadre and get promotion – The principle of reservation in promotions would be applicable where the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are not adequately represented in promotional posts
(1996) 3 AD 313 : (1996) 73 FLR 986 : (1996) 3 JT 439 : (1996) 3 SCALE 44 : (1996) 5 SCC 167 : (1996) 3 SCR 266…
Vacancies of drivers – The respondent was initially appointed as a daily-wager in Guntur Municipality. After completion of 5 years of service as NMR he was regularized. It is the claim of the respondent that during this period he was working as a driver and, therefore, after regularisation as a Class IV employee he should be assigned the duties and the pay scale of driver
(1998) 8 SCC 380 : (1998) SCC(L&S) 1591 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR MUNICIPALITY — Appellant Vs. B. CHRISTUDASU — Respondent ( Before : S. P. Kurdukar, J;…
Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376 read with Section 90 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 378 – Rape – Acquittal by High Court – Misconception of fact – If consent is given by prosecutrix under misconception of fact, it is vitiated – Accused had sexual intercourse with prosecutrix by giving false assurance to prosecutrix that he would marry her –
AIR 2014 SC 384 : (2014) 1 CCR 28 : (2014) CriLJ 540 : (2014) 1 JCC 398 : (2014) 1 JT 315 : (2014) 1 RCR(Criminal) 173 :…
Accident—Proof of rashness and negligence on the part of the driver of the vehicle, is sine qua non for maintaining an application under Section 166 of the M.V. Act. Document—Admissibly of—Once a part of the contents of the document is admitted in evidence, the party bringing the same on record cannot be permitted to turn round and contend that the other contents contained in the rest part thereof had not been proved.
2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2513 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 2526 of…