The plaintiff/respondent having been found as a successor to the property from his maternal grand- mother and was in possession of the property delivered by the mortgagee, succession to the estate of grand-mother furnished him the title to the property
(1996) 7 AD 709 : (1996) 9 JT 549 : (1996) 7 SCALE 641 : (1997) 2 SCC 212 : (1996) 6 SCR 689 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA…
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrpic Substances Act, 1985-Section 50 – Search and seizure – Notice of option of search – Compliance of – Presumption as to cannot be raised
(2000) CriLJ 3181 : (2000) 71 ECC 698 : (1999) 10 JT 349 : (1999) 7 SCC 88 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA C. ALI — Appellant Vs. STATE OF…
Order of termination – Respondent is a temporary appointee; his termination is bad in law – The respondent should be deemed to have been confirmed and directed payment of the wages amounting to six years salary
(1996) 8 AD 737 : (1996) 8 SCALE 441 : (1997) 2 SCC 217 : (1997) SCC(L&S) 463 : (1996) 8 SCR 24 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIRECTOR,…
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 100 – Second appeal – High Court dismissed the second appeal as no substantial question of law involved
(2005) 11 JT 93 : (2004) 10 SCALE 267 : (2005) 1 SCC 598 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SARJAS RAI AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. BAKSHI INDERJIT SINGH —…
It is necessary for the Appellate Court which is confronted with the absence of the convict as well as his Counsel, to immediately proceed against the persons who stood surety at the time when the convict was granted bail, as this may lead to his discovery and production in Court – So far as the present Appeal is concerned, since a request for remand had been made which Court stoutly reject, and since the convict was not represented through Counsel before the High Court, Court think it proper to permit the Appellant an opportunity to argue the Appeal on its merits.
(2013) 10 AD 565 : (2013) 4 RCR(Criminal) 880 : (2013) 12 SCALE 492 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SURYA BAKSH SINGH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTAR…
The Tribunal came to the conclusion that the plastic piece parts continued to remain under Entry 15A(2) until the enactment of the Bill on 19th April, 1982, whereupon they became classifiable under Entry 68 – The Act does not take account of Exemption Notifications for they apply only when goods are exigible to duty but, thereby, the payment of duty or a part thereof is exempted – Appeal dismissed.
(1997) 57 ECC 245 : (1996) 87 ELT 577 : (1997) 10 JT 368 : (1996) 7 SCALE 719 : (1997) 2 SCC 220 : (1996) 7 SCR 664…
Relief was granted to the petitioners on the basis of the judgment reported as State of U.P. v. Annapurna Biscuit Manufacturing Co. – There is no advertence to Annapurna Biscuit Manufacturing Co.’s case – That case, as said before stands pro tanto overruled.It could not have been the basis to grant relief to the respondents by the High Court – Appeal allowed.
(1999) 8 SCC 137 : (2000) 117 STC 420 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), SALES TAX AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. KHERIA BROTHERS AND ANOTHER — Respondent…
it is well-settled that there must be a chain of circumstances and this solitary circumstance cannot be said to form a chain so as to fasten guilt upon the accused and on the basis of the same, irresistible conclusion, which is incompatible with the innocence of the accused cannot be drawn – Appeal allowed.
(2004) 11 SCC 391 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH C.T. PONNAPPA — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA — Respondent ( Before : H. K. Sema, J; B. N.…
However, when there are other surrounding circumstances which reveal that there were doubts about origin of accounts and monies deposited therein, same principles would not apply – Respondent had not been able to establish that same were neither proceeds of crime nor untainted property – Bail cancelled.
(2012) CriLJ 630 : (2011) 4 RCR(Criminal) 427 : (2011) 11 SCALE 302 : (2011) 109 SCL 615 : (2011) 11 SCR 778 : (2011) 6 UJ 4268 SUPREME COURT…
Murder—Culpable Homicide—A verbal altercations—Sudden fight—Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC is applicable and the offence is relatable to Section 304 Part I and not Section 302 IPC.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2821 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 1172 of…