….it is observed that while deciding the appeals, this Court has made no observations with respect to the right of the IPS Officers for deputation, in terms of the recruitment rules, if any, as the same was not the controversy and/or issue before this Court and the decision of this Court shall be construed with respect to grant of Organised Group ‘A’ Central Services only.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SRI HARANANDA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Rohinton Fali Nariman and M.R. Shah, JJ.…
It is clear that even encumbered area shall be declared as a rehabilitation area provided the Slum Rehabilitation Authority requires the said area for implementation of the Scheme. Admittedly, the disputed area of 1045.50 sq. mts. implementation of the Scheme. The contention of the Appellant that the declaration of 1045.50 sq. mts. under Section 3C of the Act is in colourable exercise of power is not acceptable. – Appeal dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH KANTABAI VASANT AHIR AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and Hemant…
The High Court failed to notice that there is no prior adjudication in favour of the Respondent and the Respondent was given an opportunity to show cause as to why the premises should not be sealed. After considering the explanation submitted by the Respondent, the penalty was imposed on the Respondent and due to the failure of the payment of the amount of penalty, the premises were sealed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. M/S RIGA SUGAR CO. LTD. — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and Hemant…
Revenue records – Title – name was recorded in the Survey Settlement of 1964 as a recorded tenant in the suit property, it would not make him the sole and exclusive owner of the suit property – since entries in the revenue records do not confer title to a property, nor do they have any presumptive value.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PRAHLAD PRADHAN AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SONU KUMHAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indu Malhotra and Krishna Murari, JJ. ) Civil…
Magistrate Can Invoke Power U/S 156(3) CrPC Even At Post-Cognizance Stage, SC Says 43 Yr Old Precedent Wrongly Decided
Magistrate Can Invoke Power U/S 156(3) CrPC Even At Post-Cognizance Stage, SC Says 43 Yr Old Precedent Wrongly Decided IMP:: We, therefore, set aside the impugned High Court judgment insofar…
Section 24 RFCTLARR Act- Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Seek Declaration That Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/subsequent-purchasers-declaration-that-land-acquisition-proceedings–148959
Section 24 RFCTLARR Act- Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Seek Declaration That Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed No right can be claimed based on a transfer made by way of execution of…
Purchaser Of Goods For Commercial Purpose Is A Consumer If He Uses It Himself For Earning His Livelihood
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9004-9005/2018 SUNIL KOHLI & ANR. Appellants VERSUS M/s. PUREARTH INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. Respondent J U D G M E N…
Domestic Violence Complaint Not Maintainable If The Parties Are Not Living Together In A Shared House Hold
1 ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.16 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL…
Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 – Section 13(2) – An appeal under Section 13(2) of the Act directly to the Supreme Court is not maintainable.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH H. S. YADAV — Appellant Vs. SHAKUNTALA DEVI PARAKH — Respondent ( Before : Deepak Gupta and Surya Kant, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No(s).…
There is no distinction between persons having different qualifications. There are no direct appointments. The posts are filled in only through promotions. The question is what is really being done? In our view, all that has been done is that, at a particular promotion stage, in the wisdom of the administration, recognising higher skills developed through higher qualifications, and as an incentive to others to acquire these higher qualifications, an accelerated promotion on a small percentage of posts had been granted.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. S.K. SINGH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.R. Shah, JJ.…