Dishonour of Cheque – Presumption – Discharge of debt – Even a blank cheque leaf, voluntarily signed and handed over by the accused, which is towards some payment, would attract presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH M/S. KALAMANI TEX AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. P. BALASUBRAMANIAN — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose, JJ. )…
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 – Regulations 18(15)(c) and 39(2)(a) – Winding up of mutual fund schemes – Consent of the unit holders would mean consent by majority of the unit holders who have participated in the poll, and not consent of majority of all the unit holders of the scheme.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH FRANKLIN TEMPLETON TRUSTEE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. AMRUTA GARG AND OTHERS ETC — Respondent ( Before : S. Abdul Nazeer…
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 9 and 10A – retrospective bar on the filing of applications for the commencement of CIRP during the stipulated period does not extinguish the debt owed by the corporate debtor or the right of creditors to recover it.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH RAMESH KYMAL — Appellant Vs. M/S SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and MR Shah,…
Injuries were inflicted without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender having taken advantage or acted cruelly or unusually – Appellant has served more than 18years of his jail sentence – This Court convict the appellant for an offence under Section 304 Part I IPC and sentence him to the sentence already undergone
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PARDESHIRAM — Appellant Vs. STATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH) — Respondent ( Before : Hemant Gupta and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
If the disciplinary authority accepts the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer and passes an order, no detailed reasons are required to be recorded in the order imposing punishment – Punishment is imposed based on the findings recorded in the enquiry report
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH BOLORAM BORDOLOI — Appellant Vs. LAKHIMI GAOLIA BANK AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah, JJ.…
Lowering the minimum marks and reducing percentile for admission to the first-year BDS course would not amount to lowering the standards of education
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH HARSHIT AGARWAL AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and Krishna Murari, JJ.…
Consumer – District Forum has no power to extend the time to file the response to the complaint beyond the period of 15 days in addition to 30 days as is envisaged under Section 13 of the Act
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S DADDY’S BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. MANISHA BHARGAVA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and…
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 – Rule 12(4) – Illegal occupation of Panchayat land – Regularization and Sold – Illegal occupation of the area of more than 200 square yards can not be regularised/sold.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH JOGINDER AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ.…
Recalling of order – Merely because the order might not be in favour of the applicant earlier, cannot be a ground for recusal – A litigant cannot be permitted to browbeat the Court by seeking a Bench of its choice.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NEELAM MANMOHAN ATTAVAR — Appellant Vs. MANMOHAN ATTAVAR (D) THROUGH LRS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ.…
It is well-settled in service jurisprudence that the authority cannot fill up more than the notified number of vacancies advertised, as the recruitment of candidates in excess of the notified vacancies
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH GAJANAN BABULAL BANSODE AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao, Indu Malhotra and…