![[MPID Act, S. 2(c) & 2(d)] – Amounts advanced with promise of return and interest qualify as “deposit” accepted by “financial establishment” under the Act. – Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 Section 2(c) and Section 2(d) — Deposit and Financial Establishment — Amounts advanced to individuals with promise of repayment with interest constitute a “deposit” under Section 2(c) and the recipients are “financial establishments” under Section 2(d) of the MPID Act, irrespective of the transaction being termed as a “loan” — The nomenclature of the transaction is not determinative; the essential attributes of the transaction are key.](https://i0.wp.com/sclaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/State-Laws.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
![[Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, S. 3] – No State can levy VAT on inter-State sales; taxation power for inter-State trade vests exclusively with the Union. – Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 269 — Taxes on sale or purchase of goods in the course of inter-State trade or commerce — Levied and collected by Union but assigned to States — Parliament’s power to formulate principles for determining when such sale/purchase takes place — State legislature’s power restricted to intra-State sales.](https://i0.wp.com/sclaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Constitution-of-India.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
Matrimonial Law – Restitution of conjugal rights – Wronged party cannot be expected to continue with the matrimonial relationship. Husband is accordingly held entitled to dissolution of his marriage and consequently the wife’s application for restitution of conjugal rights stands dismissed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH JOYDEEP MAJUMDAR — Appellant Vs. BHARTI JAISWAL MAJUMDAR — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) Civil…
Murder – Examination of witnesses – It is not necessary for the prosecution to examine all the witnesses who might have witnessed the occurrence – It is the quality of evidence which is relevant in criminal trial and not the quantity.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH RAM VIJAY SINGH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : Rohinton Fali Nariman, Hemant Gupta and B.R. Gavai, JJ.…
Private Medical Educational Institutions) Act, 2017 – Ss 8 and 11 – Fixation of fee – it is no more res integra that the right conferred on the institutions to fix fee for professional courses is subject to regulation – It need not be reiterated that unaided professional institutions have the autonomy to decide on the fee to be charged, subject to the fee not resulting in profiteering or collection of capitation fee
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH NAJIYA NEERMUNDA AND ANOTHER ETC — Appellant Vs. KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST AND OTHERS ETC — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and…
Order VII Rue 11 CPC : Court Has Inherent Power To See That Frivolous Or Vexatious Litigations Are Not Allowed To Consume Its Time
“In any case, an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the plaint requires a meaningful reading of the plaint as a whole. As…
Policy decisions – It is the settled principle of law that policy decisions are open for judicial review by this Court for a very limited purpose and this Court can interfere into the realm of public policy so framed if it is either absolutely capricious.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH RACHNA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar, Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.…
Rules 4 and 5 of Rules, 1994 as well as Rule 2(b) of Rules, 2007 does in no manner disobey the mandate of Article 243S(4), both can be complied with without any conflict between the two different provisions – Provisions of Section 5(3)(iii) (a) as well as Rules 4 and 5 of Rules, 1994 and Rule 2(b) of Rules, 2007 are not inconsistent with provisions of Article 243S.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah,…
Admission to MBBS course in all medical educational institutions on the basis of merit list of NEET – All admissions to medical colleges shall be made only as per the centralized counselling done by the State Governments – All admissions to medical colleges shall be made only as per the centralized counselling done by the State Governments
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SARASWATI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and S.…
Medical – Establishment of Medical College – Essentiality Certificate – State Government has power to withdraw the Essentiality Certificate where it is obtained by playing fraud on it or where the very substratum on which the EC was granted vanishes or any other reason of like nature.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH V.N. PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST ETC — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS ETC — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R.…
I B C, 2016 – S 61 – Contempt proceeding – Provisions of the IBC are premised on a time bound process for the resolution of corporate insolvencies – Exercise of legal rights by a party to a proceeding cannot constitute contempt
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF AMTEK AUTO LIMITED THROUGH CORPORATION BANK — Appellant Vs. DINKAR T. VENKATASUBRAMANIAN AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr.…
Murder of wife at the advanced stage of pregnancy – Of late, Courts have, from the falsity of the defence plea and false answers given to Court, when questioned, found the missing links to be supplied by such answers for completing the chain of incriminating circumstances necessary to connect the person concerned with the crime committed – Accused-husband rightly convicted.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH R. DAMODARAN — Appellant Vs. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.…