(IPC) – Ss 302 and 34 – Murder – Non-examination of independent witnesses – Reliable evidence of injured eyewitnesses cannot be discarded merely for reason that no independent witness was examined.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH GURU DUTT PATHAK — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ. )…
Freedom of Expression of the Media – Freedom of speech and expression extends to reporting the proceedings of judicial institutions as well – Courts are entrusted to perform crucial functions under the law
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. M.R. VIJAYABHASKAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R.…
(i) no relief in terms of Section 116B(1) of the Act was prayed for; and, (ii) that by virtue of Gazette Notification dated 20.04.2021, respondent no.1 has already been sworn-in as a Member of the Assembly
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH OKRAM HENRY SINGH — Appellant Vs. YUMKHAM ERABOT SINGH AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit, Indira Banerjee and K.M.…
Maradu Flats Case – This Court direct that the amount of Rs.6.12 crores + 1.50 crores lying in deposit to the account of M/s.Jain Housing & Constructions Ltd. be disbursed on pro rata basis to the flat owners and agreement holders of M/s. Jain Housing & Constructions Ltd.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE KERALA STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMBER SECRETARY — Appellant Vs. MARADU MUNICIPALITY AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Navin Sinha and…
Maharashtra State Reservation (of seats for admission in educational institutions in the State and for appointments in the public services and posts under the State) for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018 as amended in 2019 granting 12% and 13% reservation for Maratha community in addition to 50% social reservation is not covered by exceptional circumstances as contemplated by Constitution Bench in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, (1992) Sup3 SCC 217.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CONSTITUTION BENCH DR. JAISHRI LAXMANRAO PATIL — Appellant Vs. THE CHIEF MINISTER AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer, L. Nageswara…
West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (WB-HIRA) is unconstitutional being repugnant to the RERA
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH FORUM FOR PEOPLE’S COLLECTIVE EFFORTS (FPCE) AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr.…
Held If the remand is absolutely illegal or the remand is afflicted with the vice of lack of jurisdiction, a Habeas Corpus petition would indeed lie. Equally, if an order of remand is passed in an absolutely mechanical manner, the person affected can seek the remedy of Habeas Corpus. Barring such situations, a Habeas Corpus petition will not lie.
Thus, we would hold as follows: If the remand is absolutely illegal or the remand is afflicted with the vice of lack of jurisdiction, a Habeas Corpus petition would…
Existence Of Arbitration Clause Does Not Debar Court From Entertaining A Writ Petition In Contractual Matter
The bench reiterated that relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may be granted in a case arising out of contract. “However, the writ jurisdiction under Article 226,…
Held, Nothing stands in the way of party autonomy in designating a seat of arbitration outside India even when both parties happen to be Indian nationals.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH PASL WIND SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED — Appellant Vs. GE POWER CONVERSION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : Rohinton Fali Nariman, B.R. Gavai…
Private unaided schools in Rajasthan shall collect annual school fees from their students as fixed under the Act of 2016 for the academic year 2019-20, but by providing deduction of 15 per cent on that amount in lieu of unutilised facilities by the students during the relevant period of academic year 2020-21
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH INDIAN SCHOOL, JODHPUR AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ.…